Transfer Pricing On Royalty For Unpaid Sales: Bombay High Court Explains Law

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:00 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs Transfer Pricing On Royalty For Unpaid Sales: Bombay High Court Explains Law
To: editor@itatonline.org

 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

CIT vs. CA Computer Associates India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)

Transfer Pricing: Arms' length royalty allowable even in respect of unpaid sales

 

The assessee entered into a Software Distribution Agreement with CA Management Inc ("CAMI") pursuant to which it was appointed as a distributor of CAMI's products in India. The assessee was required to pay an annual royalty of 30% on sales. The TPO accepted that the rate of royalty was at arms' length price but held that royalty ought not to have been paid on sales where there was complaints on quality or which had turned into bad debts. The CIT (A) upheld the TPO's stand though the Tribunal reversed it. On appeal by the department to the High Court, HELD dismissing the appeal:

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Global Green Company Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

S. 271(1)(c) penalty not valid if "satisfaction" not recorded in the assessment order