The average Tax Audit per CA were 27 in Financial Year 2010-11.
|
CBDT to provide details of No. of Tax Audit & Auditors to RTI Applicant
(1) Copy of the letter issued to ICAI in respect of the above matter.
(2) Also provide similar information relating to the next financial year 2011-12 with particulars of total number of tax audit return filed & number of auditors conducting the same.
In response to the above application CBDT has not provided the information sought even on 1st Appeal before Deputy Secretary (ITA-II), Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi-110001. I preferred 2nd Appeal before CIC, CIC issued directions to CBDT to provide information sought by me, to promote transparency in framing policy, procedure in administration of Income-Tax Act. Copy of the CIC order furnished below:-
—————————-
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Room No. 307, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan
Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066
Website: cic.gov.in
Telephone No.: +91-11-26105682
File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000460
Appellant : Shri.B.S.K.Rao, Shimoga
Public Authority : OSD(ITA.II) and DS(ITA.II), CBDT, New Delhi
Date of Hearing : 11.10.2013
Date of Decision : 11.10.2013
Heard today, dated 11.10.2013 through video conferencing,
Appellant is present.
The Public Authority is absent.
FACTS
Vide RTI dt.8.12.12, appellant had sought information on 2 points relating to tax audit datafor FY 2011-12.
2. CPIO/OSD(ITA.II) vide letter dt.18.1.2013, informed appellant that the information sought is not maintained in this office and hence cannot be provided.
3. An appeal was filed on 22.1.13 requesting that his RTI may be transferred to the appropriate authority who have this information.
4. AA vide order dt.27.2.13, directed US(ITA-II)/CPIO to re-examine the matter and furnish requisite information in respect of query no.1 while response in respect of query no.2 of CPIO was upheld.
5. Submissions made by the appellant were heard. Appellant submitted that he has not been provided information sought by him in his RTI in respect of his query 2(b), when similar information has been provided to ICAI.
DECISION
6. The Commission finds that the information sought by the appellant is of statistical nature which should be available with the Directorate of IT(Systems). We direct CPIO to provide information sought by the appellant within three weeks from date of receipt of the order. If the CPIO is not the repository of the information, then it should be transferred to the appropriate CPIO, under information to the commission and the appellant.
The appeal is disposed of,
Sd/-
(Rajiv Mathur)
Central Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy forwarded to:-
The OSD(ITA.II) and CPIO CBDT,
Department of Revenue,
North Block, New Delhi.
The DS(ITA.II) and First Appellate Authority
CBDT
Department of Revenue,
Room No.247A, North Block,
New Delhi
Sri B.S.K.Rao,
Auditor & Tax Advocate,
BDKRAO, Beside SBI, Tilak Nagar,
SHimoga, Karnataka State-577201
(Raghubir Singh)
Deputy Registrar
11.10.2013
No comments:
Post a Comment