Pages

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Important Transfer Pricing Verdict On CUP Method And Retro Effect To Rule 10AB


 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgements are available for download at itatonline.org.


Toll Global Forwarding India Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

CUP method can be applied by a comparing a pricing formulae, rather than the pricing quantification in amount. Rule 10AB inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2012 is beneficial in nature and so retrospective w.e.f. 01.04.2002

The assessee followed the 50:50 business model of sharing residual profits in equal ratio with the service provider at the other end of the transaction i.e. at the consignee's end in the case of export transaction and at consigner's end in the case of import transaction. This is a standard practice in the Industry. Even […]


M/s Vijay Veer Singh vs. ITO (ITAT Agra)

Disallowance u/s 184(5) of interest, salary etc paid by a firm to partners cannot be made if the Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 is due to incompleteness of accounts & not due to failures referred to in s. 144

The Tribunal had to consider whether disallowances for payments in respect of remuneration and interest on capital paid to the partners, in computation of taxable income of the firm, can be made under section 184(5) when even though assessment is completed under section 144 but the assessee has not committed any such failure as is […]


Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

ACIT vs. Inlay Marketing Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)

S. 153A/ 153C: Entire law on recording of satisfaction by the AO and limitation period explained

__._,_.___

No comments:

Post a Comment