Pages

Friday, September 7, 2012

iT Matter September -2012

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <admin@zawarassociate.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Subject: iT Matter September -2012
To: rgzawar@gmail.com


Dear Sir,

"Have a Great Day"

Please find the "iT Matter September -2012" We look forward to your valuable feedback/suggestion, as it will help us to improve & cover topics desired by you.

click here:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=1iBnRm3aQ9fU2W7ESFvadd-f_6-_cdn0rCJOxSjolcsk1ztyM1HqDYdM9ZFOQ


Regard

 

Shri. Rajendra G. Zawar

ZAWAR ASSOCIATES

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

8/129,Mhada Complex , Opp.

Vishal Mega Mart , Station Road,

Aurangabad.

Ph. No.0240-2350305

M.No.-9423456220

 

 


Thursday, September 6, 2012

Section 10A Exemption + S. 197 TDS + S. 271(1)(c) Penalty

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:49 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs S. 10A Exemption + S. 197 TDS + S. 271(1)(c) Penalty
To: editor@itatonline.org


 

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgements are available for download at itatonline.org:

 

CIT vs. TEI Technologies Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court )
S. 10A is an "exemption" provision even after the amendment and loss of non-10A unit cannot be set-off against s. 10A profits
S. 10A, even after the amendment by the FA 2000 w.e.f. 1.4.2001 is an "exemption" provision and the current years and the brought forward loss suffered by a non-EPZ unit cannot be set-off against the s. 10A unit's profits (Yokogawa India Ltd 341 ITR 385 (Kar), Hindustan Unilever 325 ITR 102 (Bom) & Black and Veatch Consulting (Bom) referred).
Serco BPO Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (Punjab & Haryana High Court)

S. 197 TDS application cannot be rejected for extraneous reasons

U/s 197 read with Rule 28AA, the AO's decision not to issue a s. 197 certificate for lower TDS on the ground that (a) the assessee had violated the TDS provisions & (b) s. 276B & 271(C) proceedings were pending is not correct as these issues are not relevant to s. 197

CIT vs. Aditya Birla Nova Ltd (Bombay High Court )
Reliance Petroproducts 322 ITR 158 (SC) is not "per incuriam"
The department's argument that Explanation 1(B) to s. 271(1) mandates levy of penalty where a claim for deduction is not upheld, even though there is disclosure of material facts and that Reliance Petroproducts has not noticed Explanation-1 to s. 271(1) and is "per incuriam" is not acceptable because the entire s. 271(1) was considered.


(Click Here To Read More)


Regards,


Editor,


itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

CIT vs. Wander Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)

If Quantum Appeal admitted by Court, s. 271(1)(c) penalty proceedings may be kept in abeyance till the decision of the High Court on the merits



Section 271(1)(c) Penalty + 14A On Trading Stock + FTS + 40(a)(i) TDS

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs S. 271(1)(c) Penalty + 14A On Trading Stock + FTS + 40(a)(i) TDS
To: editor@itatonline.org


 

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgements are available for download at itatonline.org:

 

ACIT vs. Ashok Raj Nath (ITAT Delhi)
Despite s. 143(2) notice, Revised ROI saves from s. 271(1)(c) penalty
Merely because a notice u/s 143(2) had already been issued and the assessee filed revised return thereafter, disclosing additional income towards capital gains, which was not correctly shown in the original return, does not tantamount to detection of concealment of income u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act (Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC) followed) {see also Radheshyam Sarda (ITAT Indore)}
Esquire Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 14A does not apply to dividend on shares held for trading purposes

If the dividend income is incidental to trading activity, following the principles laid down in CCI Ltd vs. JCIT 206 Taxman 563 (Kar), expenditure incurred in acquiring shares cannot be apportioned to the dividend for making disallowance u/s 14A. As held in CIT vs. Smt. Leena Chandran 339 ITR 296 (Ker) interest paid on funds borrowed for acquisition of shares in the form of investment would only attract disallowance under section 14A {see also Yatish Trading 129 ITD 237 ; Contra: American Express }

DCIT vs. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Installation & commissioning services are an integral part of supply and not assessable as "fees for technical services" despite seperate contract
Though there was a seperate contract for supply and a seperate one for installation and commissioning services, the said services had to be treated as "ancillary and subsidiary as well as inextricable and essentially linked to the sale/supply of the equipment" and, therefore, was not chargeable to tax in India in the hands of the Canadian company as "fees for included services". Consequently, the s. 40(a)(i) disallowance was not sustainable.
Channel Guide India Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
S. 40(a)(i) disallowance cannot be made on basis of retrospective law
At the time the payments were made, the rentals for user of satellite were not chargeable to tax as "royalty" u/s 9(1)(vi) as per Asia Satellite 332 ITR 340 (Del) & B4U International and so there was no obligation of TDS. The retrospective amendment by FA 2012 cannot create an obkligation for TDS because the law cannot possibly compel a person to do something which is impossible to perform


(Click Here To Read More)


Regards,


Editor,


itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

S. 10A Exemption + S. 197 TDS + S. 271(1)(c) Penalty



Resolve All Arrears Demand Grievances Within 30 Days: CBDT To CCITs

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs Resolve All Arrears Demand Grievances Within 30 Days: CBDT To CCITs
To: editor@itatonline.org


 

Dear Subscriber,

Resolve All Arrears Demand Grievances Within 30 Days: CBDT To CCITs

Vide letter dated 3.09.2012 addressed to Chief Commissioners and Director Generals of Income-tax, the CBDT has stated that the issue of demand management continues to remain an area of grave concern and that in most of the cases demand uploaded is incorrect and incomplete. It is stated that such demands have been uploaded by AOs without due diligence and verification and that adjustment of such demands against refunds is leading to public grievances. The CBDT has directed that it is imperative to correct the demand data base and quickly rectify cases, where wrong adjustments have taken place and that all arrears demand grievances should be resolved within 30 days.


(Click Here To Read More)


Regards,


Editor,


itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Court On Its Own Motion vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

High Court seeks to end TDS & Refund harassment by Department



ITR VOL 346 PART 5 AND ITR (TRIB) VOL 18 PART 3


 

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)

INCOME TAX REPORTS

Volume 346 Part 5 (Issue dated 3-9-2012)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Appeal to High Court --Delay in filing appeal--Condonation of delay--Causes of delay to be examined--Delay can be condoned if there is sufficient cause--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 260A-- CIT v. Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd. (Gauhati) . . . 428

----Limitation--Power to condone delay in filing appeal--Law applicable--Effect of insertion of sub-section (2A) of section 260A with retrospective effect from 1-10-1998--Amendment empowering High Court to condone delay--Order of High Court on 16-6-2010 refusing to condone delay--Order not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 260A-- CIT v . Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd. (No. 2 ) (Gauhati) . . . 436

Interpretation of taxing statutes --Legal fiction-- CIT v . Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd . (No. 2 ) (Gauhati) . . . 436

----Reasonable interpretation-- Maheshwari Agro Industries v. Union of India  (Raj) . . . 375

Precedent --Effect of decision of Supreme Court in CIT v . Kelvinator of India Ltd . [2010] 320 ITR 561-- NYK Line (India) Ltd. v . Deputy CIT (No. 2) (Bom) . . . 361

Reassessment --Notice--Condition precedent--Tangible material to show escapement of income--Amount kept in separate account not added as income in original account--Details regarding amount disclosed--Similar amount assessed in subsequent year--Not a ground for reopening assessment--Notice of reassessment not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- NYK Line (India) Ltd. v . Deputy CIT (No. 2)
(Bom) . . . 361

----Notice--Sanction for notice--Section 151 providing for sanction by Joint Commissioner--Sanction by Commissioner--Notice not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 148, 151-- Ghanshyam K. Khabrani v . Asst. CIT (Bom) . . . 443

----Notice--Special deduction--Housing projects--Notice issued on ground that commercial establishment of housing project developed by assessee exceeded statutory limit--Provision disqualifying assessee from claiming benefits under section 80-IB(10) introduced subsequently--Not applicable to assessment year under consideration--Notice to be quashed--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80-IB, 148-- Kalpataru Sthapatya Pvt. Ltd . v. ITO (Guj) . . . 371

----Notice after four years--Validity--Notice on basis of a letter from Additional Director (Investigation) that ten crores of rupees was received by assessee in previous year relevant to assessment year 2003-04--Addition of nearly five crores in assessment year 2003-04--Notice to include balance in assessment year 2004-05--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Ghanshyam K. Khabrani v. Asst. CIT
(Bom) . . . 443

----Notice beyond four years--Condition precedent--Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Assessee disclosing full particulars and disclosure also by statutory auditor--Fact that similar amount was added back in subsequent assessment--Not sufficient--Notice not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- NYK Line (India) Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (No. 1) (Bom) . . . 355

Recovery of tax --Stay of recovery proceedings--First appellate authority has inherent power to grant stay--Assessing Officer has discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not in default--Discretion should ordinarily be exercised in favour of assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 220(6), 246, 251-- Maheshwari Agro Industries v. Union of India (Raj) . . . 375

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

Non-resident --Fees for technical services--Processing of acquired seismic data for UAE company which had contract with ONGC--Provision of technical personnel for analysing data--Services are technical and consultancy services--Services not amounting to a mining or like project or the work of prospecting for extraction or production of mineral oil--Exception not attracted--Income not from Government or an Indian concern and not separately assessable under section 115A or 44DA--Income assessable under section 44BB(1)--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 9(1)(vii), Expln. 2 , 44BB-- Spectrum Geo Limited , In re . . . 422

 

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))

Volume 18 : Part 3 (Issue dated : 3-09-2012)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal --Delay in filing appeal--Condonation of delay--Reasonable explanation for delay--Delay to be condoned--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

----Notice--Service of notice--Service of notice mandatory--Failure by Department to serve notice to assessee--Appeal to be dismissed--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 254-- ITO v. Rachana Constructions and Engineers and Contractors (Pune) . . . 262

----Powers of Tribunal--Power to admit additional evidence--Evidence authentic and necessary for decision--Evidence can be admitted--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

Capital gains --Full value of consideration--Valuation of property--Land--Circle rate and location of land clarified by Tehsildar and Sub-Registrar--Circle rate lower than rate shown by assessee in purchase deed--Sale registered by stamp valuation authority at value shown by assessee--Onus of proof on Department to show understatement of consideration--Addition on basis of rate adopted by Valuation Officer not permissible--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 50C-- Assistant CIT v. Anjali Dua (Delhi) . . . 267

Double taxation relief --Assessee resident of India--Having permanent establishments in Oman, Mauritius, Netherlands and Tanzania--Income attributable thereto can be taxed in India--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 5, 90-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

Export --Special deduction--Indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Method of determination--Apportionment in ratio of export turnover to total turnover--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHC-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

Foreign project --Special deduction--Conditions precedent--Deduction cannot exceed sum placed in reserve--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHB-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

Non-resident --Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 5, 9, 195, 201--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the U. S. A, art. 12--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the U. K., arts. 13, 15--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the Kingdom of Thailand, arts. 7, 14, 22--Circular Nos. 4 dated 16-7-2002, 10 dated 9-10-2002, 728 dated 30-10-1995, 786 dated 7-2-2000-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

----Double taxation avoidance--General principles--Effect of articles 11 and 12--Interest and royalty can be taxed in source State--Tax cannot exceed 15 per cent. and 10 per cent.--Term â€Å“tax†includes surcharge and education cess--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore, arts. 2, 11 and 12-- DIC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Kolkata) . . . 358

----Reinsurance broker--Intermediary or advisory services in selecting reinsurer--Not a case of provision of technical services--Payment received from insurance company in India not fees for technical services--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 9(1)(vii), Expln. 2--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the United Kingdom, art. 13(4)-- Guy Carpenter and Co. Ltd. (No. 1) v. Additional Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Delhi) . . . 333

Reassessment --Foreign project--Special deduction--Deduction granted in excess of sum placed in reserve--Income deemed to have escaped assessment--Reassessment justified--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80HHB, 148-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Notice after four years--Export--Special deduction--Failure by assessee to furnish working of indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Amounts to failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment--Reassessment proper--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80HHC, 147, 148-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Notice solely on basis of statement recorded under section 133A--No evidentiary value--Reassessment to be set aside--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 133A, 147, 148-- Dr. J. Mohan v. Assistant CIT (Chennai) . . . 363

----Notice within four years--Validity--Some facts not available on record and some facts not brought to notice of Assessing Officer--Notice valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

Revision --Order passed by Assessing Officer on remand by Tribunal--Assessing Officer verifying factum of transfer of discount under direction of Tribunal--Order of Assessing Officer not erroneous--Revision not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 263-- Surindra Enterprises v. ITO (Chandigarh) . . . 325

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Singapore :

Art. 2 --Non-resident--Double taxation avoidance--General principles--Effect of articles 11 and 12--Interest and royalty can be taxed in source State--Tax cannot exceed 15 per cent. and 10 per cent.--Term â€Å“tax†includes surcharge and education cess-- DIC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Kolkata) . . . 358

Art. 11 --Non-resident--Double taxation avoidance--General principles--Effect of articles 11 and 12--Interest and royalty can be taxed in source State--Tax cannot exceed 15 per cent. and 10 per cent.--Term â€Å“tax†includes surcharge and education cess-- DIC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Kolkata) . . . 358

Art. 12 --Non-resident--Double taxation avoidance--General principles--Effect of articles 11 and 12--Interest and royalty can be taxed in source State--Tax cannot exceed 15 per cent. and 10 per cent.--Term â€Å“tax†includes surcharge and education cess-- DIC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Kolkata) . . . 358

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the U. K. :

Art. 13 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Art. 13(4) --Non-resident--Reinsurance broker--Intermediary or advisory services in selecting reinsurer--Not a case of provision of technical services--Payment received from insurance company in India not fees for technical services-- Guy Carpenter and Co. Ltd. (No. 1) v. Additional Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Delhi) . . . 333

Art. 15 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the U. S. A :

Art. 12 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the Kingdom of Thailand :

Art. 7 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Art. 14 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Art. 22 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 5 --Double taxation relief--Assessee resident of India--Having permanent establishments in Oman, Mauritius, Netherlands and Tanzania--Income attributable thereto can be taxed in India-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

S. 9 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

S. 9(1)(vii), Expln. 2 --Non-resident--Reinsurance broker--Intermediary or advisory services in selecting reinsurer--Not a case of provision of technical services--Payment received from insurance company in India not fees for technical services---- Guy Carpenter and Co. Ltd. (No. 1) v. Additional Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Delhi) . . . 333

S. 50C --Capital gains--Full value of consideration--Valuation of property--Land--Circle rate and location of land clarified by Tehsildar and Sub-Registrar--Circle rate lower than rate shown by assessee in purchase deed--Sale registered by stamp valuation authority at value shown by assessee--Onus of proof on Department to show understatement of consideration--Addition on basis of rate adopted by Valuation Officer not permissible-- Assistant CIT v. Anjali Dua (Delhi) . . . 267

S. 80HHB --Foreign project--Special deduction--Conditions precedent--Deduction cannot exceed sum placed in reserve-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Reassessment--Foreign project--Special deduction--Deduction granted in excess of sum placed in reserve--Income deemed to have escaped assessment--Reassessment justified-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

S. 80HHC --Export--Special deduction--Indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Method of determination--Apportionment in ratio of export turnover to total turnover-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Export--Special deduction--Failure by assessee to furnish working of indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Amounts to failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment--Reassessment proper-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

S. 90 --Double taxation relief--Assessee resident of India--Having permanent establishments in Oman, Mauritius, Netherlands and Tanzania--Income attributable thereto can be taxed in India-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

S. 133A --Reassessment--Notice solely on basis of statement recorded under section 133A--No evidentiary value--Reassessment to be set aside-- Dr. J. Mohan v. Assistant CIT (Chennai) . . . 363

S. 147 --Reassessment--Notice after four years--Export--Special deduction--Failure by assessee to furnish working of indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Amounts to failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment--Reassessment proper-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Reassessment--Notice solely on basis of statement recorded under section 133A--No evidentiary value--Reassessment to be set aside-- Dr. J. Mohan v. Assistant CIT (Chennai) . . . 363

----Reassessment--Notice within four years--Validity--Some facts not available on record and some facts not brought to notice of Assessing Officer--Notice valid-- Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

S. 148 --Reassessment--Foreign project--Special deduction--Deduction granted in excess of sum placed in reserve--Income deemed to have escaped assessment--Reassessment justified-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Export--Special deduction--Failure by assessee to furnish working of indirect expenses attributable to export of trading goods--Amounts to failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment--Reassessment proper-- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Delhi) . . . 368

----Reassessment--Notice solely on basis of statement recorded under section 133A--No evidentiary value--Reassessment to be set aside-- Dr. J. Mohan v. Assistant CIT (Chennai) . . . 363

----Reassessment--Notice within four years--Validity--Some facts not available on record and some facts not brought to notice of Assessing Officer--Notice valid-- Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

S. 195 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

S. 201 --Non-resident--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement--Hotel in India entering into agreement with U.S. chain of hotels--Consultancy agreements with non-resident companies for making interior and exterior changes--No permanent establishments for non-residents--No transfer of technology--Amounts paid to non-residents not assessable in India-- Assistant CIT v. Viceroy Hotels Ltd. (Hyderabad) . . . 282

S. 254 --Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Notice--Service of notice--Service of notice mandatory--Failure by Department to serve notice to assessee--Appeal to be dismissed-- ITO v. Rachana Constructions and Engineers and Contractors (Pune) . . . 262

S. 263 --Revision--Order passed by Assessing Officer on remand by Tribunal--Assessing Officer verifying factum of transfer of discount under direction of Tribunal--Order of Assessing Officer not erroneous--Revision not valid-- Surindra Enterprises v. ITO (Chandigarh) . . . 325

 



Principals to advise the articled trainee(s) who have registered for articleship training

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: BOS - ICAI <email@icai.ind.in>
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:24 PM
Subject: Principals to advise the articled trainee(s) who have registered for articleship training
To:


Dear Sir,

This is to bring to your kind notice that the Council has decided that the General Management & Communication Skills (GMCS) Course, presently being organized for 15 days for the CA students shall be organized twice during the period of articled training as under:

(i) GMCS-I           (15 days)     - during 1st year of articled training
(ii) GMCS-II         (15 days)     - after completion of 18 months of training
                                             but before completion of articled training

In view of the above, students, who have registered for Articled Training on or after 1st May, 2012 are required to undergo GMCS-I Course during the 1st year of articled training.

General Management and Communication Skills Course has been designed for the students to develop effective communication and conversational skills and also to inculcate business acumen and to improve public relations skills. The inputs on Strategic Decision Making, Articulation Skills, Data Analysis and Research Methodology, Group Discussion and Preparation of Project Report etc. are essential to face the upcoming challenges of the professional environment.  

Therefore, you are requested to advise the articled trainee(s) working under your guidance to undergo the GMCS-I Course, since it is a regulatory requirement and part of the Articled training. There is an option for those who are registered prior to 1st May also to attend, which however would be counted as leave. This initiative would strengthen your office and keep the trainees motivated.


Thanking you,


Yours faithfully,
(CA. Nilesh Shivji Vikamsey)
Chairman, Board of Studies



Exclusion of certain topics from the Paper-7A/6B of IPCC/PCC – Information Technology from November, 2012 examination and onwards

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: BOS - ICAI <email@icai.ind.in>
Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Subject: Exclusion of certain topics from the Paper-7A/6B of IPCC/PCC – Information Technology from November, 2012 examination and onwards
To: cvpawar@gmail.com


Dear Student,

While reviewing topics included in the Paper-7A/6B of IPCC/PCC - Information Technology, it is observed that  some of the topics are not at all relevant in the present day context and thus it has been decided that no question be asked from such topics from November 2012 examination and onwards till the syllabus is thoroughly revised.  Hence, no questions will be asked from the following topics in November, 2012 examination and onwards:-

 

Chapter/Unit Number and Name

Syllabus

Page Numbers in Study Material

Chapter – 1

Unit-I Introduction to Computers

Unit-II Input and Output Devices

(a)Computer Hardware

Classification of Computers – Personal Computer, Workstation, Servers and Super computers

Computer Components – CPU, Inputs output devices, Storage devices, Storage devices

(b) Bus, I/O CO Processors, Ports (Serial, parallel, USB ports), Expansion slots, Add on cards, On board chips, LAN cards, Multi media cards, Cache Memory, Buffers, Controllers and drivers

1.1- 1.105

Chapter-IV: Internet and other Technologies

EDI

4.48 – 4.53

 

You are requested to take note of the above exclusion of topics for the forthcoming examination.

With best wishes,

Yours sincerely,

 

(Vijay Kapur) 

Director,
Board of Studies