Pages

Friday, March 18, 2011

ITR VOL 332 PART 1 AND ITR (TRIB) VOL 8 PART 3


 

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)

Volume 332 : Part 1 (Issue dated 21-3-2011)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

SUPREME COURT

Committee on Disputes --Suggested by Supreme Court--For deciding disputes between entities of State--Outlived its utility-- Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. v. Union of India . . . 58

Legislative powers --Parliament--Extra-territorial jurisdiction--Scope of--Constitution of India, art. 245--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 9(1)(i), (vii)(b)-- G. V. K. Industries Ltd . v. ITO . . . 130

HIGH COURTS

Assessment --Special audit--No evidence that Assessing Officer had considered accounts and found them complex--Order for special audit and consequent assessment--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 142(2A)-- Alidhara Texpro Engineering P. Ltd . v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 115

Central Board of Direct Taxes --Co-operative bank--Return--Delay in filing return--Condonation of delay--Delay in audit by auditor appointed under Act--Not attributable to assessee--Sufficient cause--Delay to be condoned--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 119(2)(b)-- Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CBDT (Bom) . . . 87

Company --Liability of director of private company--Scope of section 179--"Tax" contemplated by section 179 does not include penalty and interest--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(43), 179-- H. Ebrahim v. Deputy CIT (Karn) . . . 122

----Recovery of tax--Liability of director of private company--Director must prove absence of gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty--Company failing to file returns for more than a decade--Amounts due to Commercial Tax Department and banks--Directors liable--Section 179 applicable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 179-- H. Ebrahim v. Deputy CIT (Karn) . . . 122

Dividend --Deemed dividend--Loan to shareholder--Exclusion where lending of money constitutes substantial part of business of company--Meaning of "substantial part"--Finding that lending money constituted substantial part of business of company--Loan not assessable as deemed dividend--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 2(22)(e)(ii)-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd. (Bom) . . . 63

Export --Special deduction--Assessee not entitled to simultaneous deduction under sections 80-IB and 80HHC by virtue of specific exclusion under section 80-IB(13)--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80-IB, 80HHC-- Olam Exports (India) Ltd. v. CIT (Ker) . . . 40

----Special deduction--Computation--Sales made through export houses--Can be included if disclaimer certificate produced--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHC-- Olam Exports (India) Ltd. v. CIT (Ker) . . . 40

Industrial undertaking --Export--Special deduction--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80HHC and 80-IA--Relief under section 80-IA to be reduced from profits and gains of business before computing relief under section 80HHC--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80HHC, 80-IA(9)-- Great Eastern Exports v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 14

----Special deduction under section 80-IA--Computation of special deduction--Determination of business income--Depreciation not claimed by assessee had to be deducted--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 32, 80-IA-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd .(Bom) . . . 63

----Special deduction under section 80-IB --Computation of special deduction--Transport subsidy and interest subsidy--Not profits and gains derived from industrial undertaking--Not includible while computing special deduction--Refund of excise duty--Excise duty has nexus with profits of industrial undertaking--Refund of excise duty to be taken into account while computing special deduction--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80-IB-- CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Gau) . . . 91

----Special deduction--Computation--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80-IA and 80HHC--For computation of deduction under any section under heading C of Chapter VI-A profits of business not to be reduced by profits of business allowed under section 80-IA(1)--Restriction in section 80-IA(9) relates to allowance of deduction and not to computation of deduction--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80-IA, 80HHC--CBDT Circular No. 772 dated 23-12-1998-- Associated Capsules P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Bom) . . . 42

Interpretation of taxing statutes --Literal construction-- Great Eastern Exports v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 14

----Literal interpretation-- CWT v. Smt. K. R. Ushasree (Ker) . . . 75

----Purposive construction--Aids to construction-- Great Eastern Exports v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 14

Offences and prosecution --Inordinate delay in proceedings--Complaint dismissed--Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s. 482--Constitution of India, art. 227-- Rakoor Industries P. Ltd. v. R. L. Bali, ITO (Delhi) . . . 56

Precedent --Effect of decision of Supreme Court in Liberty India v. CIT [2009] 317 ITR 218-- CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Gau) . . . 91

Revision --Commissioner conceding Assessing Officer making inquiries, eliciting replies before treating expenses as revenue expenditure--Not a case of lack of inquiry--Department accepting accounting practice followed by assessee for past years and future--Revision questioning accounting practice not justified--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 263-- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 167

----Commissioner--Assessee manufacturing car parts--Periodical replacement of dies in machines to retain accuracy--No new asset comes into existence--Replacement in nature of replacement of part of machinery--Opinion of Assessing Officer treating expenditure as revenue expenditure is plausible--No material before Commissioner to vary that opinion--Order not prejudicial to Revenue--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 263-- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 167

Transfer of case --Transfer from Assessing Officer subordinate to a Commissioner to another subordinate to a different Commissioner--Condition precedent for transfer--Both Commissioners must agree to transfer--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Reason for transfer must be recorded--Charitable trust assessed by a particular Commissioner and chairman of trust by another--No evidence of interlinking of funds of trust and individual business of chairman--Block assessment of chairman as individual becoming final--Notice of transfer to trust without giving reasons--Order of transfer not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 124, 127-- Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. CIT (Mad) . . . 97

Wealth-tax --Assessment--Best judgment assessment--Condition precedent--Notice under section 16(4)--Failure by assessee to file return--Notice under section 17 calling for return--Assessee denying liability to file return--Notice under section 16(4)(i) calling for return--No further necessity for notice under section 16(4)(ii)--Best judgment assessment valid--Wealth-tax Act, 1957, ss. 16(4)(i), (ii), (5), 17-- CWT v. Motor and General Finance Limited (Delhi) . . . 1

----Asset--Law applicable--Effect of amendment w.e.f. 1-4-1992--Cash in hand in excess of Rs. 50,000 of individuals and HUFs--Assessable--Wealth-tax Act, 1957, s. 2(ea)(vi)-- CWT v. Smt. K. R. Ushasree (Ker) . . . 75

----Valuation of property--Provision for opportunity to assessee to be heard by Valuation Officer--No further opportunity to be given before Assessing Officer--Wealth-tax Act, 1957, s. 16A-- CWT v. Vardhman Polytex Ltd . (P&H) . . . 81

Words and phrases --Meaning of "substantial part"-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd. (Bom) . . . 63

Writ --Special audit--Assessment after receipt of report of special auditor--Writ petition filed two months after order of assessment challenging validity of order for special audit--Petition dismissed on account of delay--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 142(2A)--Constitution of India, art. 226.-- Alidhara Texpro Engineering P. Ltd . v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 115

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 :

S. 482 --Offences and prosecution--Inordinate delay in proceedings--Complaint dismissed-- Rakoor Industries P. Ltd. v. R. L. Bali, ITO (Delhi) . . . 56

Constitution of India :

Art. 226 --Writ--Special audit--Assessment after receipt of report of special auditor--Writ petition filed two months after order of assessment challenging validity of order for special audit--Petition dismissed on account of delay-- Alidhara Texpro Engineering P. Ltd . v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 115

Art. 227 --Offences and prosecution--Inordinate delay in proceedings--Complaint dismissed-- Rakoor Industries P. Ltd. v. R. L. Bali, ITO (Delhi) . . . 56

Art. 245 --Legislative powers--Parliament--Extra-territorial jurisdiction--Scope of-- G. V. K. Industries Ltd . v. ITO SC) . . . 130

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(22)(e)(ii) --Dividend--Deemed dividend--Loan to shareholder--Exclusion where lending of money constitutes substantial part of business of company--Meaning of "substantial part"--Finding that lending money constituted substantial part of business of company--Loan not assessable as deemed dividend-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd. (Bom) . . . 63

S. 2(43) --Company--Liability of director of private company--Scope of section 179 --"Tax" contemplated by section 179 does not include penalty and interest-- H. Ebrahim v. Deputy CIT (Karn) . . . 122

S. 9(1)(i) --Legislative powers--Parliament--Extra-territorial jurisdiction--Scope of-- G. V. K. Industries Ltd . v. ITO (SC) . . . 130

S. 9(1)(vii)(b) --Legislative powers--Parliament--Extra-territorial jurisdiction--Scope of -- G. V. K. Industries Ltd . v. ITO (SC) . . . 130

S. 32 --Industrial undertaking--Special deduction under section 80-IA--Computation of special deduction--Determination of business income--Depreciation not claimed by assessee had to be deducted-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd . (Bom) . . . 63

S. 80HHC --Export--Special deduction--Assessee not entitled to simultaneous deduction under sections 80-IB and 80HHC by virtue of specific exclusion under section 80-IB(13)-- Olam Exports (India) Ltd. v. CIT (Ker) . . . 40

----Export--Special deduction--Computation--Sales made through export houses--Can be included if disclaimer certificate produced--Matter remanded-- Olam Exports (India) Ltd. v. CIT (Ker) . . . 40

----Industrial undertaking--Export--Special deduction--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80HHC and 80-IA--Relief under section 80-IA to be reduced from profits and gains of business before computing relief under section 80HHC-- Great Eastern Exports v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 14

----Industrial undertaking--Special deduction--Computation--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80-IA and 80HHC--For computation of deduction under any section under heading C of Chapter VI-A profits of business not to be reduced by profits of business allowed under section 80-IA(1)--Restriction in section 80-IA(9) relates to allowance of deduction and not to computation of deduction--CBDT Circular No. 772 dated 23-12-1998-- Associated Capsules P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Bom) . . . 42

S. 80-IA --Industrial undertaking--Special deduction under section 80-IA--Computation of special deduction--Determination of business income--Depreciation not claimed by assessee had to be deducted-- CIT v. Parle Plastics Ltd . (Bom) . . . 63

----Industrial undertaking--Special deduction--Computation--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80-IA and 80HHC--For computation of deduction under any section under heading C of Chapter VI-A profits of business not to be reduced by profits of business allowed under section 80-IA(1)--Restriction in section 80-IA(9) relates to allowance of deduction and not to computation of deduction--CBDT Circular No. 772 dated 23-12-1998-- Associated Capsules P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Bom) . . . 42

S. 80-IA(9) --Industrial undertaking--Export--Special deduction--Assessee entitled to deduction under sections 80HHC and 80-IA--Relief under section 80-IA to be reduced from profits and gains of business before computing relief under section 80HHC-- Great Eastern Exports v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 14

S. 80-IB --Export--Special deduction--Assessee not entitled to simultaneous deduction under sections 80-IB and 80HHC by virtue of specific exclusion under section 80-IB(13)-- Olam Exports (India) Ltd. v. CIT (Ker) . . . 40

----Industrial undertaking--Special deduction under section 80-IB --Computation of special deduction--Transport subsidy and interest subsidy--Not profits and gains derived from industrial undertaking--Not includible while computing special deduction--Refund of excise duty--Excise duty has nexus with profits of industrial undertaking--Refund of excise duty to be taken into account while computing special deduction-- CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Gau) . . . 91

S. 119(2)(b) --Central Board of Direct Taxes--Co-operative bank--Return--Delay in filing return--Condonation of delay--Delay in audit by auditor appointed under Act--Not attributable to assessee--Sufficient cause--Delay to be condoned-- Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CBDT (Bom) . . . 87

S. 124 --Transfer of case--Transfer from Assessing Officer subordinate to a Commissioner to another subordinate to a different Commissioner--Condition precedent for transfer--Both Commissioners must agree to transfer--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Reason for transfer must be recorded--Charitable trust assessed by a particular Commissioner and chairman of trust by another--No evidence of interlinking of funds of trust and individual business of chairman--Block assessment of chairman as individual becoming final--Notice of transfer to trust without giving reasons--Order of transfer not valid-- Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. CIT (Mad) . . . 97

S. 127 --Transfer of case--Transfer from Assessing Officer subordinate to a Commissioner to another subordinate to a different Commissioner--Condition precedent for transfer--Both Commissioners must agree to transfer--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Reason for transfer must be recorded--Charitable trust assessed by a particular Commissioner and chairman of trust by another--No evidence of interlinking of funds of trust and individual business of chairman--Block assessment of chairman as individual becoming final--Notice of transfer to trust without giving reasons--Order of transfer not valid-- Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. CIT (Mad) . . . 97

S. 142(2A) --Assessment--Special audit--No evidence that Assessing Officer had considered accounts and found them complex--Order for special audit and consequent assessment--Not valid-- Alidhara Texpro Engineering P. Ltd . v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 115

----Writ--Special audit--Assessment after receipt of report of special auditor--Writ petition filed two months after order of assessment challenging validity of order for special audit--Petition dismissed on account of delay-- Alidhara Texpro Engineering P. Ltd . v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 115

S. 179 --Company--Liability of director of private company--Scope of section 179--"Tax" contemplated by section 179 does not include penalty and interest-- H. Ebrahim v. Deputy CIT (Karn) . . . 122

----Company--Recovery of tax--Liability of director of private company--Director must prove absence of gross neglect or misfeasance or breach of duty--Company failing to file returns for more than a decade--Amounts due to Commercial Tax Department and banks--Directors liable--Section 179 applicable-- H. Ebrahim v. Deputy CIT (Karn) . . . 122

S. 263 --Revision--Commissioner conceding Assessing Officer making inquiries, eliciting replies before treating expenses as revenue expenditure--Not a case of lack of inquiry--Department accepting accounting practice followed by assessee for past years and future--Revision questioning accounting practice not justified-- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 167

----Revision--Commissioner--Assessee manufacturing car parts--Periodical replacement of dies in machines to retain accuracy--No new asset comes into existence--Replacement in nature of replacement of part of machinery--Opinion of Assessing Officer treating expenditure as revenue expenditure is plausible--No material before Commissioner to vary that opinion--Order not prejudicial to Revenue-- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 167

Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :

S. 2(ea)(vi) --Wealth-tax--Asset--Law applicable--Effect of amendment w.e.f. 1-4-1992--Cash in hand in excess of Rs. 50,000 of individuals and HUFs--Assessable-- CWT v. Smt. K. R. Ushasree (Ker) . . . 75

S. 16(4)(i) --Wealth-tax--Assessment--Best judgment assessment--Condition precedent--Notice under section 16(4)--Failure by assessee to file return--Notice under section 17 calling for return--Assessee denying liability to file return--Notice under section 16(4)(i) calling for return--No further necessity for notice under section 16(4)(ii)--Best judgment assessment valid-- CWT v. Motor and General Finance Limited (Delhi) . . . 1

S. 16(4)(ii) --Wealth-tax--Assessment--Best judgment assessment--Condition precedent--Notice under section 16(4)--Failure by assessee to file return--Notice under section 17 calling for return--Assessee denying liability to file return--Notice under section 16(4)(i) calling for return--No further necessity for notice under section 16(4)(ii)--Best judgment assessment valid-- CWT v. Motor and General Finance Limited (Delhi) . . . 1

S. 16(5) --Wealth-tax--Assessment--Best judgment assessment--Condition prece-dent--Notice under section 16(4)--Failure by assessee to file return--Notice under section 17 calling for return--Assessee denying liability to file return--Notice under section 16(4)(i) calling for return--No further necessity for notice under section 16(4)(ii)--Best judgment assessment valid-- CWT v. Motor and General Finance Limited (Delhi) . . . 1

S. 16A --Wealth-tax--Valuation of property--Provision for opportunity to assessee to be heard by Valuation Officer--No further opportunity to be given before Assessing Officer-- CWT v. Vardhman Polytex Ltd . (P&H) . . . 81

S. 17 --Wealth-tax--Assessment--Best judgment assessment--Condition precedent --Notice under section 16(4)--Failure by assessee to file return--Notice under section 17 calling for return--Assessee denying liability to file return--Notice under section 16(4)(i) calling for return--No further necessity for notice under section 16(4)(ii)--Best judgment assessment valid-- CWT v. Motor and General Finance Limited (Delhi) . . . 1

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))

Volume 8 : Part 3 (Issue dated : 21-3-2011)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Appeal --Interest--Appeal against chargeability of interest--Maintainable-- Asst. CIT v. Smt. Leonie M. Almeida (Mumbai) . . . 293

Assessment --Validity of assessment--Return filed in response to notice under section 148--Assessment under section 143(3) without issuing notice under section 143(2) --Assessment order void--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 143-- H. Gouthamchand v. Addl. CIT (Bangalore) . . . 269

Business expenditure --Expenditure on advertising--Finding that no expenditure had been incurred--Amount not deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961-- BDPS Software Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 280

Capital gains or business income --Income from purchase and sale of shares--Factors to be considered--Assessee treating shares as investment in books over 30 years --No funds borrowed for investment in shares--Average period of holding of shares under short-term capital gains category 181 days--Primary purpose of long-term appreciation--Income to be treated as capital gains--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 28, 45--Circular No. 4 of 2007 dated June 15, 2007-- Deputy CIT v. Bharat Kunverji Kenia (Mumbai) . . . 325

Deduction of tax at source --Commission--Payment to non-resident agent of artistes in foreign countries in connection with Indian tour--No material to infer that payment actually part of fees paid to performers--Agent not an artiste or entertainer--Payment falling under business profits--No permanent establishment in India--Payments not taxable in India--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 90(2), 201--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and U. K., arts. 7, 18--CBDT Circulars Nos. 17 of 1953, dated July 17, 1953 and 786, dated February 7, 2000-- Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment P. Ltd. (Mumbai) . . . 334

----Non-resident--International artistes coming to perform in India--Reimbursement of expenses not chargeable as income--Payments not liable to deduction of tax at source-- Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment P. Ltd. (Mumbai) . . . 334

Depreciation --Finding that there had been no purchase of assets--Depreciation not allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 32-- BDPS Software Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 280

Exemption --Income of venture capital company--Law applicable--Amendment of section 10(23FB) by Finance Act, 2007--Amendment not retrospective--Interest in FDRs earned in accounting year relevant to assessment year 2002-03--Entitled to exemption--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10(23FB)-- India Value Fund v. Asst. CIT (Mumbai) . . . 246

Income --Interest--Interest amount earned on infrastructure development fund--Held not an income of assessee in previous year--Addition to be deleted--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Saharanpur Development Authority v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 263

Income from house property --Deductions--Maintenance charges recovered from tenant and paid to society--Charges for facilities of generator, lift, lighting, common area sweeping--Not covered by 30 per cent. deduction--Allowable--Interest on housing loan--Subsequent loan taken to repay loan taken for house property--Interest allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 23, 24--CBDT Circular No. 28 dated August 20, 1969 (F. No. 8/8/69-IT(AL))-- Asst. CIT v. Sunil Kumar Agarwal (Lucknow) . . . 304

Income from other sources --Deduction--Interest--Interest earned on amount advanced directly correlated to interest spent on amount borrowed--Assessee entitled to deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii)--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 56, 57(iii)-- ITO v. Beam Estates P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 300

Income-tax --General principles--Rule of consistency-- Deputy CIT v. Bharat Kunverji Kenia (Mumbai) . . . 325

Loss --Carry forward and set off--Provision providing for lower rate of tax on short-term capital gains arising on transactions suffering securities transaction tax--Computation--Choice of setting off of short-term capital loss suffered after cut-off date against short-term capital gain earned prior to cut-off date--Computation of capital gain prescribed under section 48 cannot be confused with rate of tax under sections 111A and 115D--Income-tax Act 1961, ss. 48, 70, 111A, 115D-- First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 315

Recovery of tax --Interest--Settlement of cases--Settlement Commission--Jurisdiction--With effect from date of admission of application for settlement not from date of application for settlement--Assessment order passed before date of admission of application by Settlement Commission--Interest on demand under assessment order leviable up to date of admission of settlement application--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 220(2), 245D(1)-- Asst. CIT v. Smt. Leonie M. Almeida (Mumbai) . . . 293

Registration --Assessee applying under section 12AA on June 1, 2007 for registration with retrospective effect--Change of law --Not applicable in respect of any application for registration filed on or after June 1, 2007--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 12A, 12AA-- Saharanpur Development Authority v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 263

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and U. K. :

Arts. 7, 18 --Deduction of tax at source--Commission--Payment to non-resident agent of artistes in foreign countries in connection with Indian tour--No material to infer that payment actually part of fees paid to performers--Agent not an artiste or entertainer--Payment falling under business profits--No permanent establishment in India--Payments not taxable in India--CBDT Circulars Nos. 17 of 1953, dated July 17, 1953 and 786, dated February 7, 2000-- Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment P. Ltd. (Mumbai) . . . 334

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 10(23FB) --Exemption--Income of venture capital company--Law applicable--Amendment of section 10(23FB) by Finance Act, 2007--Amendment not retrospective--Interest in FDRs earned in accounting year relevant to assessment year 2002-03--Entitled to exemption-- India Value Fund v. Asst. CIT (Mumbai) . . . 246

S. 12A --Registration--Assessee applying under section 12AA on June 1, 2007 for registration with retrospective effect--Change of law--Not applicable in respect of any application for registration filed on or after June 1, 2007-- Saharanpur Development Authority v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 263

S. 12AA --Registration--Assessee applying under section 12AA on June 1, 2007 for registration with retrospective effect--Change of law--Not applicable in respect of any application for registration filed on or after June 1, 2007-- Saharanpur Development Authority v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 263

S. 23 --Income from house property--Deductions--Maintenance charges recovered from tenant and paid to society--Charges for facilities of generator, lift, lighting, common area sweeping--Not covered by 30 per cent. deduction--Allowable--Interest on housing loan--Subsequent loan taken to repay loan taken for house property--Interest allowable--CBDT Circular No. 28 dated August 20, 1969 (F. No. 8/8/69-IT(AL))-- Asst. CIT v. Sunil Kumar Agarwal (Lucknow) . . . 304

S. 24 --Income from house property--Deductions--Maintenance charges recovered from tenant and paid to society--Charges for facilities of generator, lift, lighting, common area sweeping--Not covered by 30 per cent. deduction--Allowable--Interest on housing loan--Subsequent loan taken to repay loan taken for house property--Interest allowable--CBDT Circular No. 28 dated August 20, 1969 (F. No. 8/8/69-IT(AL))-- Asst. CIT v. Sunil Kumar Agarwal (Lucknow) . . . 304

S. 28 --Capital gains or business income--Income from purchase and sale of shares--Factors to be considered--Assessee treating shares as investment in books over 30 years--No funds borrowed for investment in shares--Average period of holding of shares under short-term capital gains category 181 days--Primary purpose of long-term appreciation--Income to be treated as capital gains--Circular No. 4 of 2007 dated June 15, 2007-- Deputy CIT v. Bharat Kunverji Kenia (Mumbai) . . . 325

S. 32 --Depreciation--Finding that there had been no purchase of assets--Depreciation not allowable-- BDPS Software Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 280

S. 45 --Capital gains or business income--Income from purchase and sale of shares --Factors to be considered--Assessee treating shares as investment in books over 30 years--No funds borrowed for investment in shares--Average period of holding of shares under short-term capital gains category 181 days--Primary purpose of long-term appreciation--Income to be treated as capital gains--Circular No. 4 of 2007 dated June 15, 2007-- Deputy CIT v. Bharat Kunverji Kenia (Mumbai) . . . 325

S. 48 --Loss--Carry forward and set off--Provision providing for lower rate of tax on short-term capital gains arising on transactions suffering securities transaction tax--Computation--Choice of setting off of short-term capital loss suffered after cut-off date against short-term capital gain earned prior to cut-off date--Computation of capital gain prescribed under section 48 cannot be confused with rate of tax under sections 111A and 115D-- First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 315

S. 56 --Income from other sources--Deduction--Interest--Interest earned on amount advanced directly correlated to interest spent on amount borrowed--Assessee entitled to deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii)-- ITO v. Beam Estates P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 300

S. 57(iii) --Income from other sources--Deduction--Interest--Interest earned on amount advanced directly correlated to interest spent on amount borrowed--Assessee entitled to deduction of interest expenditure under section 57(iii)-- ITO v. Beam Estates P. Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 300

S. 70 --Loss--Carry forward and set off--Provision providing for lower rate of tax on short-term capital gains arising on transactions suffering securities transaction tax--Computation--Choice of setting off of short-term capital loss suffered after cut-off date against short-term capital gain earned prior to cut-off date--Computation of capital gain prescribed under section 48 cannot be confused with rate of tax under sections 111A and 115D-- First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 315

S. 90(2) --Deduction of tax at source--Commission--Payment to non-resident agent of artistes in foreign countries in connection with Indian tour--No material to infer that payment actually part of fees paid to performers--Agent not an artiste or entertainer--Payment falling under business profits--No permanent establishment in India--Payments not taxable in India--CBDT Circulars Nos. 17 of 1953, dated July 17, 1953 and 786, dated February 7, 2000-- Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment P. Ltd. (Mumbai) . . . 334

S. 111A --Loss--Carry forward and set off--Provision providing for lower rate of tax on short-term capital gains arising on transactions suffering securities transaction tax--Computation--Choice of setting off of short-term capital loss suffered after cut-off date against short-term capital gain earned prior to cut-off date--Computation of capital gain prescribed under section 48 cannot be confused with rate of tax under sections 111A and 115D-- First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 315

S. 115D --Loss--Carry forward and set off--Provision providing for lower rate of tax on short-term capital gains arising on transactions suffering securities transaction tax--Computation--Choice of setting off of short-term capital loss suffered after cut-off date against short-term capital gain earned prior to cut-off date--Computation of capital gain prescribed under section 48 cannot be confused with rate of tax under sections 111A and 115D-- First State Investments (Hongkong) Ltd. v. Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 315

S. 143 --Assessment--Validity of assessment--Return filed in response to notice under section 148--Assessment under section 143(3) without issuing notice under section 143(2)--Assessment order void-- H. Gouthamchand v. Addl. CIT (Bangalore) . . . 269

S. 201 --Deduction of tax at source--Commission--Payment to non-resident agent of artistes in foreign countries in connection with Indian tour--No material to infer that payment actually part of fees paid to performers--Agent not an artiste or entertainer--Payment falling under business profits--No permanent establishment in India--Payments not taxable in India--CBDT Circulars Nos. 17 of 1953, dated July 17, 1953 and 786, dated February 7, 2000-- Asst. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment P. Ltd. (Mumbai) . . . 334

S. 220(2) --Recovery of tax--Interest--Settlement of cases--Settlement Commission--Jurisdiction--With effect from date of admission of application for settlement not from date of application for settlement--Assessment order passed before date of admission of application by Settlement Commission--Interest on demand under assessment order leviable up to date of admission of settlement application-- Asst. CIT v. Smt. Leonie M. Almeida (Mumbai) . . . 293

S. 245D(1) --Recovery of tax--Interest--Settlement of cases--Settlement Commission--Jurisdiction--With effect from date of admission of application for settlement not from date of application for settlement--Assessment order passed before date of admission of application by Settlement Commission--Interest on demand under assessment order leviable up to date of admission of settlement application-- Asst. CIT v. Smt. Leonie M. Almeida (Mumbai) . . . 293

 CA.RAJU SHAH


Thursday, March 17, 2011

NSDL new FVU for quarterly TDC / TCS returns

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paras Chhajed, FCA, Rajnandgaon <jain.parasmal@icai.org>
 

The NSDL has released new FVUs for TDS / TCS returns. The details are as under
 

 

Key features of File Validation Utility (FVI) version 2.130

·       Applicable for quarterly e-TDS/TCS statement (regular and correction) upto F.Y. 2009-10

·       Rupee symbol incorporated for amount fields in FVU statement statistic report.

·       For validating e-TDS/TCS statement upto FY 2009-10 refer the table below:

FVU version of  e-TDS/TCS Regular statement submitted

FVU version applicable for e-TDS/TCS Correction statement

FVU version 2.126

FVU version 2.130

FVU version 2.128

FVU version 2.130

FVU version 2.129

FVU version 2.130

FVU version 2.130

FVU version 2.130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.1

 

·       FVU 3.1 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/TCS statements pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards and will be mandatory w.e.f April 01, 2011.

·       Mandatory to quote Mobile No. in quarterly TDS/TCS statements for deductor category other than Central govt. and State Govt.

·       Re-introduction of PAN reference no. field in deductee/ collectee details.

·       Provision to quote the deduction under section 80CCF in salary details (applicable for 24Q Q4).

·       Total deduction under chapter VI A to include:

o   Deduction under section 80CCE

o   Deduction under section 80CCF

o   Deduction under other sections of chapter VI A

·       'Surcharge' amount in salary details (provided annually in Annexure II -- 24Q Q4) should be less than or equal to 'Total Taxable Income'.

·       'Education cess' amount in salary details (provided annually in Annexure II -- 24Q Q4) should be less than or equal to 'Total Taxable Income'.

·       'Net Income tax payable' amount in salary details (provided annually in Annexure II -- 24Q Q4) should be less than or equal to 'Total Taxable Income'.

·       Highlight transaction where tax has not been deducted as threshold limit is not exceeded (as per the provisions of Income Tax Act). in the first quarter (s) but in subsequent quarter has exceeded the threshold limit.

·       Guidelines for reporting such transactions is as below:

 

Guidelines for reporting TDS transactions where amount paid to deductee has not exceeded the threshold limit in the first quarter but in subsequent quarters has exceeded threshold limit (as issued by the Directorate of Income Tax – Systems)

 

1)     Flag "Y" should be selected in the field of 'Reason for non deduction/ lower deduction' to highlight transactions where TDS is not deducted as the threshold for deducting tax has not exceeded.

2)     If threshold flag is provided then rate of deduction should be '0.0000' and tax deducted/ deposited (deductee) amount should be '0.00'.

3)     Threshold flag is can be quoted only  against the following section codes in corresponding challan details:
193,194, 194A, 194B, 194BB, 194C, 194D, 194EE, 194G, 194H, 194I, 194J, 194LA

4)     Example:

·       In case there is no deduction of tax in the first two quarters of a F.Y., where the prescribed rate of deduction as per Income Tax Rules is 10%, the deductor should report those transactions in the respective quarterly TDS statements with zero rate of deduction ('0.0000'), zero tax deducted/ deposited ('0.00') and amount paid in the respective quarters with threshold flag.

 

·       In the third quarter the threshold limit exceeds, the deductor will mention the prescribed rate of deduction, the amount paid in the third quarter, tax deducted/ deposited (deductee) on the total amount paid till that quarter. The same is represented as follows:

 

PAN

Rate of deduction

Amount paid (Rs.)

Amount deducted (Rs.)

Amount deposited (Rs.)

Reason for non deduction /lower deduction

Q1

PAN1

0

1,00,000

0

0

Threshold flag Y present

Q2

 

 

 

 

 

PAN1

0

1,00,000

0

0

Threshold flag Y present

Q3

 

 

 

 

 

PAN1

30%

1,00,000

30,000

30,000

No flag present

 

  • For validating e-TDS/TCS statement (regular and correction) for FY 2010-11 and onwards refer the table below:

 

FVU version of  e-TDS/TCS Regular statement  submitted

FVU version applicable for e-TDS/TCS Correction statement

FVU version 2.128

FVU version 3.1

FVU version 3.0

FVU version 3.1

FVU version 3.1

FVU version 3.1

 



--
CA Paras Chhajed
FCA, DISA (ICAI)
Azad Chowk
Rajnandgoan
491441Chhattisgarh
Ph. (07744) 224246, 403903
Mobile: 09425240246