Pages

Sunday, June 17, 2012

ANNUAL RETURN FORM FOR LOCAL BODY TAX (LBT NASHIK)


NASHIK LOCAL BODY TAX -ANNUAL RETURN FORM

CLICK HERE FOR ANNUAL RETURN FORM:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=1S4xGi9kIMGbzOyKSgAz63Px9zbEfENxLXp_kqmjqIKnToVQg3u-n5s5pnshk




Regards,
-------
CA.C.V.PAWAR
PATIL DAWARE GIRASE PAWAR & ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
0253-2319641. M-9423961209

PLAN -- PERSEVERE and PROGRESS

INDIAN CA - NURTURED IN INDIA, GROOMED FOR THE WORLD

For latest Updates visit Blogspot : http://canews1.blogspot.com

ANNUAL RETURN FORM FOR LOCAL BODY TAX (LBT NASHIK)


NASHIK LOCAL BODY TAX -ANNUAL RETURN FORM

CLICK HERE FOR ANNUAL RETURN FORM:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=1bZE6SbRV_27C89zlApGlfGxfdv7i5vNOy678C1IAqffbPIe9zvhUV6FMeuAH


Regards,
-------
CA.C.V.PAWAR
PATIL DAWARE GIRASE PAWAR & ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
0253-2319641. M-9423961209

PLAN -- PERSEVERE and PROGRESS

INDIAN CA - NURTURED IN INDIA, GROOMED FOR THE WORLD

For latest Updates visit Blogspot : http://canews1.blogspot.com


LOCAL BODY TAX (LBT) AT NASHIK DEVELOPMENT

As the date draws close, LBT has become a matter of discussion in NMC circles, but the civic body has still not received any formal notification from the state government.

Meanwhile, the state has organized a two-day training on local body tax from June 18, for officials from eight municipal corporations, including Nashik, Kalyan-Dombivali, Latur, Amravati, Chandrapur, Parbhani and Ahmednagar.

"We have already submitted the tax related information to the state according to its instructions. But, we have not received any notification from the state as yet with regard to LBT. However we do know that the government can issue a notification any time as it does not require the approval of the general body meeting (GBM) of municipal corporations. In Aurangabad, a state notification had been issued one day prior to the introduction of LBT there. This may also happen in case of Nashik too," the visiting official said.

The institution of local body tax in lieu of the octroi system has been a pressing demand made by Nashik's industrial bodies over the last several years.

Regards,
-------
CA.C.V.PAWAR
PATIL DAWARE GIRASE PAWAR & ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
0253-2319641. M-9423961209

PLAN -- PERSEVERE and PROGRESS

INDIAN CA - NURTURED IN INDIA, GROOMED FOR THE WORLD

For latest Updates visit Blogspot : http://canews1.blogspot.com

LOCAL BODY TAX (LBT) AT NASHIK: Notification expected to been

The state government has decided to introduce local body tax (LBT) in the jurisdiction of the Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC) and is likely to issue notification soon said a senior government official who was in the city recently.

A delegation of local industrial associations had, on May 16, met urban development secretary Manukumar Shrivastava over LBT. Shrivastava had then informed the delegation that the tax was to be implemented in Nashik from July 1.

DETAILS ABOUT THE LOCAL BODY TAX WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE ON THIS BLOG VERY SOON.

http://canews1.blogspot.in/

Regards,
-------
CA.C.V.PAWAR
0253-2319641. M-9423961209

PLAN -- PERSEVERE and PROGRESS

INDIAN CA - NURTURED IN INDIA, GROOMED FOR THE WORLD

For latest Updates visit Blogspot : http://canews1.blogspot.com

Friday, June 15, 2012

No TDS u/s 194J On Payments For Software Purchase: CBDT Notification

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs No TDS u/s 194J On Payments For Software Purchase: CBDT Notification
To: editor@itatonline.org


 

Dear Subscriber,


No TDS u/s 194J On Payments For Software Purchase: CBDT Notification


The CBDT has issued a Notification dated 13.06.2012 notifying that no deduction of tax shall be made u/s 194J on certain specified payments by a person for acquisition of software from another person. A pdf copy of the Notification is available for download

 


(Click Here To Read More)


Regards,


Editor,


itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Commissioners of Income-tax Selected For Foreign Training In USA

 




Thursday, June 14, 2012

E-filing of I T Returns A. Y. 2012-2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Parag Raval <selectparag@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:55 AM
Subject: E-filing of I T Returns A. Y. 2012-2013
To: parag <parag@gkcco.com>


E FILING ITR MUST - INCOME EXCEEDING 10 LAKH FOR INDIVIDUALS, HUF - AY 12-13

E filing of Income Tax return is must for Individuals and HUF, where Income for the Financial Year 2011-12 is more than 10 Lakh. The New rule has been added with effect from 01.04.2012 and this is applicable for assessment year 2012-13 previous year 2011-12.

 

E filing can be done with Digital signature or without digital signature (By sending ITR-V to CPC, Bangalore)

 

Means applicable to current filing of income tax return which has been started from 01.04.2012.This amendment will affect most to the salaried person. HUF/ Individuals who earns their Income through Business and covered under Audit (section 44AB) is already covered under compulsory e-filing.

 

Due Date to File Income Tax return for A. Y. 2012-13 for non audit cases is 31.07.2012 

 

Special Provision where person has interest in entity outside India 

 

Further an individual or a Hindu undivided family, being a resident, 

  • having assets (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India or 
  • signing authority in any account located outside India 

can not file return through Income tax return form ITR-1(Sahaj) or Sugam(4S). So he has to use ITR-2, ITR-3 or ITR-4. Further he has to  file his return only through E filing Mode with or without digital signature irrespective of income.

 

Special columns has been introduced in ITR-2,3,4 for such persons. No Other changes in ITR form for Assessment year 2012-13

 

Person having total taxable income up to Rs 5 lakh Salary income from one employer including saving bank interest up to Rs 10000 is exempted from Income tax return for assessment year 2012-13

 

Complete Rule 12 is Given here under for your ready reference (bold words has been amended through Income-tax (3rd Amendment) Rules, 2012).

 

12. (1) The return of income required to be furnished under sub-section (1) or sub- section (3) or sub-section (4A) or sub-section (4B) or sub-section (4C) or sub-section (4D) of section 139 or clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 142 or sub-section (1) of section 148 or section 153A 89a [***] relating to the assessment year commencing 90 [on the 1st day of April, 91 [2011]] shall,—

 

(a) in the case of a person being an individual where the total income includes income chargeable to income-tax, under the head,—

 

(i) "Salaries" or income in the nature of family pension as defined in the Explanation to clause (iia) of section 57; or

 

(ii) "Income from house property", where assessee does not own more than one house property and does not have any brought forward loss under the head; or

 

(iii) "Income from other sources", except winnings from lottery or income from race horses,be in Form 92a [SAHAJ] (ITR-1) and be verified in the manner indicated therein;] 

 

Provided that the provisions of this clause shall not apply to a person being an individual, who is a resident and has 

 

(i) assets (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India; or 

(ii) signing authority in any account located outside India."; 

 

(b) in the case of a person being an individual, not being an individual to whom clause (a) applies, or a Hindu undivided family where the total income does not include any income chargeable to income-tax under the head "Profits or gains of business or profession", be in Form No. ITR-2 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

(c) in the case of a person being an individual or a Hindu undivided family who is a partner in a firm and where income chargeable to income-tax under the head "Profits or gains of business or profession" does not include any income except the income by way of any interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration, by whatever name called, due to, or received by him from such firm, be in Form No. ITR-3 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

(ca) in the case of a person being an individual or a Hindu undivided family deriving business income and such income is computed in accordance with special provisions referred to in section 44AD and section 44AE of the Act for computation of business income, be in Form SUGAM (ITR-4S) and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

Provided that the provisions of this clause shall not apply to a person being an individual or Hindu undivided family, who is a resident and has 

 

(i) assets (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India; or 

 

(ii) signing authority in any account located outside India." 

 

(d) in the case of a person being an individual or a Hindu undivided family other than the individual or Hindu undivided family referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (ca) and deriving income from a proprietory business or profession, be in Form No. ITR-4 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

(e) in the case of a person not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family or a company or a person to which clause (g) applies, be in Form No. ITR-5 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

(f) in the case of a company not being a company to which clause (g) applies, be in Form No. ITR-6 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

(g) in the case of a person including a company whether or not registered under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), required to file a return under sub-section (4A) or sub-section (4B) or sub-section (4C) or sub-section (4D) of section 139, be in Form No. ITR-7 and be verified in the manner indicated therein;

 

 (2) The return of income required to be furnished in Form SAHAJ (ITR-1) or Form No. ITR-2 or Form No. ITR-3 or Form SUGAM (ITR-4S) or Form No. ITR-4 or Form No. ITR-5 or Form No. ITR-6 shall not be accompanied by a statement showing the computation of the tax payable on the basis of the return, or proof of the tax, if any, claimed to have been deducted or collected at source or the advance tax or tax on self-assessment, if any, claimed to have been paid or any document or copy of any account or form or report of audit required to be attached with the return of income under any of the provisions of the Act.]

 

(3) The return of income referred to in sub-rule (1) may be furnished in any of the following manners, namely:—

 

(i) furnishing the return in a paper form;

 

(ii) furnishing the return electronically under digital signature;

 

(iii) transmitting the data in the return electronically and thereafter submitting the verification of the return in Form ITR-V;

 

(iv) furnishing a bar-coded return in a paper form:

 

Provided that—

 

(a) an individual or a Hindu undivided family, if his or its total income, or the total income in respect of which he is or it is assessable under the Act during the previous year, exceeds ten lakh rupees, shall furnish the return for the assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent assessment years in the manner specified in clause(ii) or clause(iii); 

 

(aa) an individual or a Hindu undivided family, being a resident, having assets (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India or signing authority in any account located outside India and required to furnish the return in Form ITR-2 or ITR-3 or ITR-4, as the case may be, shall furnish the return for assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent assessment years in the manner specified in clause (ii) or clause (iii);" 

 

(aaa) a firm required to furnish the return in Form ITR-5 or an individual or Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) required to furnish the return in Form ITR-4 and to whom provisions of section 44AB are applicable, shall furnish the return for assessment year 2011-12 and subsequent assessment years in the manner specified in clause (ii)

 

(ab) a company required to furnish the return in Form ITR-6 shall furnish the return for assessment year 2010-11 and subsequent assessment years in the manner specified in clause (ii);

 

(b) a person required to furnish the return in Form ITR-7 shall furnish the return in the manner specified in clause (i).

 

(4) The Director-General of Income-tax (Systems) shall specify the procedures, formats and standards for ensuring secure capture and transmission of data and shall also be responsible for evolving and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to furnishing the returns in the manners specified in clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv) of sub-rule (3).

 

(5) Where a return of income relates to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 2010 or any earlier assessment year, it shall be furnished in the appropriate form as applicable in that assessment year.


* * *

With Regards,

CA. PARAG RAVAL, Ahmedabad

 




Tuesday, June 12, 2012

ITR VOL 345 PART 1 AND ITR (TRIB) VOL 16 PART 3


 

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)

Volume 345 Part 1 (Issue dated 18-6-2012)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal --Appeal by Revenue--Summons should be sent to assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Smt. Santosh Singla v . ITO (Delhi) . . . 8


Assessment --Notice--Mandatory--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 143(2)-- CIT v . Mukesh Kumar Agrawal (All) . . . 29


Block assessment --Tribunal has power to entertain additional evidence--Tribunal ought to have remitted the matter to Assessing Officer for consideration--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 132--Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, rr. 18(4), 29-- CIT v . Ku. Pa. Krishnan (Mad) . . . 38


Business loss --Real estate business--Amount advanced for purchase of property--Property not transferred and amount not repaid--Loss deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961-- CIT v . New Delhi Hotels Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 1


Search and seizure --Settlement Commission--Jewellery seized to be released under bank guarantee--Proceedings before Settlement Commission abating by change of law--Assessing Officer failing to pass assessment order within time specified--Assessment proceedings in pursuance of search and seizure to be set aside--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 132B(3), 153(4), 245D, 245HA-- Rajendra Kumar Verma v . Director General (Investigation) of Income-tax (All) . . . 32


AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

Non-resident --Investment in Indian company in form of equity and convertible debentures--Sale of investment to holding company of Indian company before conversion of debentures into equity--Debentures remain debt till discharged--Conversion rate determined on basis of period of holding--Gains arising on sale of debentures to be taxed as interest--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 2(28A)--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius, art. 11(4)-- Z , In re. . . 11

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART


Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius :

Art. 11(4) --Non-resident--Investment in Indian company in form of equity and convertible debentures--Sale of investment to holding company of Indian company before conversion of debentures into equity--Debentures remain debt till discharged--Conversion rate determined on basis of period of holding--Gains arising on sale of debentures to be taxed as interest-- Z ,In re Ã¢€˜(AAR) . . . 11


Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(28A) --Non-resident--Investment in Indian company in form of equity and convertible debentures--Sale of investment to holding company of Indian company before conversion of debentures into equity--Debentures remain debt till discharged--Conversion rate determined on basis of period of holding--Gains arising on sale of debentures to be taxed as interest-- Z ,In re (AAR) . . . 11


S. 132 --Block assessment--Tribunal has power to entertain additional evidence--Tribunal ought to have remitted the matter to Assessing Officer for consideration-- CIT v . Ku. Pa. Krishnan (Mad) . . . 38


S. 132B(3) --Search and seizure--Settlement Commission--Jewellery seized to be released under bank guarantee--Proceedings before Settlement Commission abating by change of law--Assessing Officer failing to pass assessment order within time specified--Assessment proceedings in pursuance of search and seizure to be set aside-- Rajendra Kumar Vermav . Director General (Investigation) of Income-tax (All) . . . 32


S. 143(2) --Assessment--Notice--Mandatory-- CIT v . Mukesh Kumar Agrawal(All) . . . 29


S. 153(4) --Search and seizure--Settlement Commission--Jewellery seized to be released under bank guarantee--Proceedings before Settlement Commission abating by change of law--Assessing Officer failing to pass assessment order within time specified--Assessment proceedings in pursuance of search and seizure to be set aside-- Rajendra Kumar Vermav . Director General (Investigation) of Income-tax 
(All) . . . 32

S. 245D --Search and seizure--Settlement Commission--Jewellery seized to be released under bank guarantee--Proceedings before Settlement Commission abating by change of law--Assessing Officer failing to pass assessment order within time specified--Assessment proceedings in pursuance of search and seizure to be set aside-- Rajendra Kumar Verma v . Director General (Investigation) of Income-tax (All) . . . 32


S. 245HA --Search and seizure--Settlement Commission--Jewellery seized to be released under bank guarantee--Proceedings before Settlement Commission abating by change of law--Assessing Officer failing to pass assessment order within time specified--Assessment proceedings in pursuance of search and seizure to be set aside-- Rajendra Kumar Vermav . Director General (Investigation) of Income-tax  (All) . . . 32


Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 :


Rr. 18(4), 29 --Block assessment--Tribunal has power to entertain additional evidence--Tribunal ought to have remitted the matter to Assessing Officer for consideration-- CIT v . Ku. Pa. Krishnan (Mad) . . . 38

 

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))

Volume 16 : Part 3 (Issue dated : 11-6-2012)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART


Appeal to Appellate Tribunal --Grounds of appeal--Question not raised before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Not a question on which assessee can be aggrieved for appeal to Tribunal--Regular assessment made prior to search allowing special deduction--Disallowance in assessment pursuant to search--Question of jurisdiction to make assessment under section 153A not in issue before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Does not arise out of order of lower authorities--Pure question of law not requiring fresh facts--Can be raised--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80-IA(4), 253-- All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 380


Capital asset --Personal effects--Purchase and sale of paintings--Number of paintings too large to be held personal effects--Paintings preserved in packed condition and not displayed in assessee's home--Not personal effects--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 2(14)(ii)-- V. Sanjay Kumar v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 262


Capital gains --Transfer--Meaning of--Business sold as going concern in July 1997--Transfer of land as part of business--50 per cent. of sale consideration received and 50 per cent. placed in escrow account--All rights in land transferred and possession given--Land was transferred in 1997--Gains assessable in assessment year 1998-99--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(47), 45-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


Capital or revenue expenditure --Expenditure on voluntary retirement scheme of employees--Revenue expenditure--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


Deduction of tax at source --Failure to deduct tax--Payment towards purchase of software--Right of use of software limited--Payment towards royalty--Tax to be deducted--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 195, 201(1)--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Switzerland, art. 12(3)-- ING Vysya Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Bangalore) . . . 296


Depreciation --Law applicable--Effect of insertion of Explanation 5 to section 32(1) w. e. f. 1-4-2002--Explanation 5 providing for compulsory allowance of depreciation--Not retrospective--Details not furnished--Depreciation not allowable for assessment year 1998-99--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 32-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


Income --Diversion of income by overriding title--Development authority constituted by State Government--Authorised to collect fees and charges--Major portion of fees and charges credited to separate account and utilized for purposes of development--No distinction among receipts--Fees and charges forming part of balance-sheet of assessee--No diversion of funds by overriding title to State Government--Income was of assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority v. Addl. CIT (Delhi) . . . 358


Loss --Carry forward and set off--Bank--Ready forward transactions--Order of Commissioner (Appeals) allowing loss to be set off against speculation profits--Failure by Assessing Officer to set off--Not a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income--Disallowance not a ground to initiate penalty proceedings--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 271(1)(c)--Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


Penalty --Concealment of income--Limitation for passing order--Appeal against penalty--Limitation runs from date of appellate order--Not from date of disposal of miscellaneous application by assessee on other matters--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 253, 254, 275(1)(a)-- Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


----Concealment of income--Surrender of income to avoid litigation and buy peace--No concealment of income--Penalty cannot be imposed--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 271(1)(c)-- ITO v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Delhi) . . . 303

Search and seizure --Assessment--Unexplained investment--Payment for painting purchased prior to search made by cheque after search--Not to be treated as unexplained investment--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 69-- V. Sanjay Kumar v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 262


Trading or investment --Purchase and sale of paintings--Details of number of paintings purchased and sold year-wise and amount for which purchase and sale not available on record--Whether activity trading or investment to be decided on basis of such details--Matter remanded-- V. Sanjay Kumar v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 262


SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Switzerland :

Art. 12(3) --Deduction of tax at source--Failure to deduct tax--Payment towards purchase of software--Right of use of software limited--Payment towards royalty--Tax to be deducted-- ING Vysya Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Bangalore) . . . 296


Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(14)(ii) --Capital asset--Personal effects--Purchase and sale of paintings--Number of paintings too large to be held personal effects--Paintings preserved in packed condition and not displayed in assessee's home--Not personal effects-- V. Sanjay Kumar v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 262


S. 2(47) --Capital gains--Transfer--Meaning of--Business sold as going concern in July 1997--Transfer of land as part of business--50 per cent. of sale consideration received and 50 per cent. placed in escrow account--All rights in land transferred and possession given--Land was transferred in 1997--Gains assessable in assessment year 1998-99-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


S. 32 --Depreciation--Law applicable--Effect of insertion of Explanation 5 to section 32(1) w. e. f. 1-4-2002--Explanation 5 providing for compulsory allowance of depreciation--Not retrospective--Details not furnished--Depreciation not allowable for assessment year 1998-99-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


S. 37 --Capital or revenue expenditure--Expenditure on voluntary retirement scheme of employees--Revenue expenditure--Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


S. 45 --Capital gains--Transfer--Meaning of--Business sold as going concern in July 1997--Transfer of land as part of business--50 per cent. of sale consideration received and 50 per cent. placed in escrow account--All rights in land transferred and possession given--Land was transferred in 1997--Gains assessable in assessment year 1998-99-- Deputy CIT v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 309


S. 69 --Search and seizure--Assessment--Unexplained inve

stment--Payment for painting purchased prior to search made by cheque after search--Not to be treated as unexplained investment-- V. Sanjay Kumar v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 262

S. 80-IA(4) --Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Grounds of appeal--Question not raised before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Not a question on which assessee can be aggrieved for appeal to Tribunal--Regular assessment made prior to search allowing special deduction--Disallowance in assessment pursuant to search--Question of jurisdiction to make assessment under section 153A not in issue before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Does not arise out of order of lower authorities--Pure question of law not requiring fresh facts--Can be raised-- All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 380


S. 195 --Deduction of tax at source--Failure to deduct tax--Payment towards purchase of software--Right of use of software limited--Payment towards royalty--Tax to be deducted-- ING Vysya Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Bangalore) . . . 296


S. 201(1) --Deduction of tax at source--Failure to deduct tax--Payment towards purchase of software--Right of use of software limited--Payment towards royalty--Tax to be deducted-- ING Vysya Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Bangalore) . . . 296


S. 253 --Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Grounds of appeal--Question not raised before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Not a question on which assessee can be aggrieved for appeal to Tribunal--Regular assessment made prior to search allowing special deduction--Disallowance in assessment pursuant to search--Question of jurisdiction to make assessment under section 153A not in issue before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals)--Does not arise out of order of lower authorities--Pure question of law not requiring fresh facts--Can be raised-- All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [SB] (Mumbai) . . . 380


----Penalty--Concealment of income--Limitation for passing order--Appeal against penalty--Limitation runs from date of appellate order--Not from date of disposal of miscellaneous application by assessee on other matters-- Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


S. 254 --Penalty--Concealment of income--Limitation for passing order--Appeal against penalty--Limitation runs from date of appellate order--Not from date of disposal of miscellaneous application by assessee on other matters-- Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


S. 271(1)(c) --Loss--Carry forward and set off--Bank--Ready forward transactions--Order of Commissioner (Appeals) allowing loss to be set off against speculation profits--Failure by Assessing Officer to set off--Not a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income--Disallowance not a ground to initiate penalty proceedings-- Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


----Penalty--Concealment of income--Surrender of income to avoid litigation and buy peace--No concealment of income--Penalty cannot be imposed-- ITO v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Delhi) . . . 303


S. 275(1)(a)--Penalty--Concealment of income--Limitation for passing order--Appeal against penalty--Limitation runs from date of appellate order--Not from date of disposal of miscellaneous application by assessee on other matters-- Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Mumbai) . . . 275


RAJU SHAH