Pages

Friday, July 26, 2013

Section14A/ Rule 8D Does Not Apply To Short-Term Investments: ITAT Chennai


 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

Sundaram Asset Management Co. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Chennai)

S. 14A/ Rule 8D does not apply to short-term investments, gains from which are taxable

In AY 2008-09 the assessee received tax-free dividend on its investments. The AO applied Rule 8D and computed the disallowance u/s 14A. Before the Tribunal, the assessee argued inter alia that s. 14A and Rule 8D did not apply to short-term investments as the gains arising on their transfer was chargeable to tax. HELD by the Tribunal:

Some of the investments made by the assessee are short term. Since assessee is paying capital gains tax on short term investments, Rule 8D will not apply on them and the AO is directed to recompute disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D after excluding short term investments.


(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest: CBDT Instruction On Work Allocation Of Departmental Representatives before ITAT

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Transfer Pricing: Companies With Extreme Turnover Are Not Comparable: Delhi High Court

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgement is available for download at the itatonline.org download center.

CIT vs. Agnity India Technologies (Delhi High Court)

Transfer Pricing: Companies with extreme turnover like Infosys are not comparable

The assessee, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bay Packets Inc., USA, was engaged in the business of development of software for the parent company in the field of telecommunications. To determine the arms' length price, the TPO & DRP took Infosys Technologies as a comparable. On appeal by the assessee, the Tribunal (included in file) held that the assessee was not comparable with Infosys as Infosys was a large and bigger company in the area of development of software and the profits earned by it cannot be benchmarked or equated with the assessee's results. One of the aspects pointed out by the Tribunal was that Infosys' turnover was Rs. 9,028 crores while that of the assessee was only Rs. 16.09 crores. On appeal by the department to the High Court, HELD dismissing the appeal:

The Tribunal's findings that Infosys should be excluded from the list of comparables for the reason that (i) Infosys was a giant company and it assumed all risks leading to higher profits, whereas the assessee was a captive unit of the parent company and assumed only a limited risk and (ii) that the financial data (turnover) was not comparable has not been controverted by the Revenue. The Tribunal has given valid and good reasons for excluding Infosys as a comparable. 

Note: This has a bearing on the question whether the turnover filter should be applied which is pending before the Special Bench in Giesecke & Devirent (ITA No.5924/Del/2012)

(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

CIT vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd (Gauhati High Court)

S. 80-IB/80-IC: Subsidies that reduce the cost of production have a direct nexus with, and are "derived from", the industrial undertaking


Dear Govt, Will You Act To Save ITAT Only After High Court Reprimands You?

Dear Subscriber,

Dear Govt, Will You Act To Save ITAT Only After High Court Reprimands You?

The author, an eminent advocate, voices his exasperation at the continued indifference of the Government towards the well-being of the Tribunal. Though 3 long years have passed, the Government has not bothered to even appoint a full-time President for the Tribunal. The author warns the Government that patience amongst the stake-holders is running thin and that the Bar will, if driven to it, have no option but to seek relief from the High Court. He cautions that if this happens, the Government will face acute embarrassment and urges the Government to get its act together to ensure that such an eventuality does not happen


(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:


ITO vs. Wadhwa & Associates Realtors (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 194-I TDS: Lease premium paid to MMRDA is not "rent"

Section 43(5) Exemption, Derivatives Loss Is Speculation Loss For Cos: Delhi High Court

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgement is available for download at the itatonline.org download center.

CIT vs. DLF Commercial Developers Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Exemption given in s. 43(5) to derivatives from being treated as "speculative transaction" not available to Expl to s. 73

In AY 2007-08 the assessee suffered a loss of Rs. 4.92 crore on account of transactions in derivatives. It claimed that as the Explanation to s. 43(5) inserted by the Finance Act 2005 w.e.f. 1.4.2006 exempted derivatives from the ambit of a "speculative transaction", the loss from trading of derivatives was not a speculative loss and could not be disallowed. The AO & CIT(A) rejected the contention and held that the Explanation to s. 73 was independent of s. 43(5) and the said loss had to be treated as a speculation loss. However, the Tribunal held that derivative transactions were separate from trading in shares and that the Explanation to s. 73 will not be applicable. On appeal by the department, HELD reversing the Tribunal:

Though the Explanation to s. 43 (5) excludes derivative transactions from the ambit of a "speculative transaction", there is nothing to show that derivative transactions are also excluded from the mischief of Explanation to s. 73 (4). S. 73 provides that the loss arising to a company out of purchase and sale of shares shall be deemed to be a "speculation loss". As derivatives are assets whose values are derived from the underlying assets, the loss on account of derivative transactions also constitutes a "speculation loss' (Bharat Ruia 337 ITR 452 (Bom) & Rajshree Sugars v. Axis Bank Ltd AIR 2011 Mad 144 referred)

(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Digest Of Imp Case Laws (Jan 2013 to May 2013) Is Available For Download



Section 194-I TDS: ITAT Explains Law On Applicability To Lease Premium Paid To MMRDA/CIDCO

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgement is available for download at the itatonline.org download center.



ITO vs. Wadhwa & Associates Realtors (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 194-I TDS: Lease premium paid to MMRDA is not "rent" 

The assessee executed a lease deed with MMRDA pursuant to which it obtained a plot of land at Bandra Kurla Complex on a long-term lease. The assessee paid MMRDA Rs. 950 crore as lease premium. The AO held that the said lease premium was in the nature of rent and that the assessee ought to have deducted TDS thereon u/s 194-I. He held the assessee to be in default and demanded tax of Rs. 314 crore. This was reversed by the CIT(A) on the ground that lease premium could not be equated with rent. On appeal by the Department to the Tribunal, HELD dismissing the appeal:

Payment under a lease may be classified under three categories (1) "premium" or "salami", (2) minimum royalty and (3) royalty per ton. Lease "premium" or "salami" is in the form of a lump sum non-recurring payment made by a prospective tenant to the landlord as consideration for grant of the lease. It is paid anterior to the constitution of relationship of landlord and tenant. It is not "rent" and has all the characteristics of a capital payment. On facts, the lease deed shows that the premium is not paid under a lease but is paid as a price for obtaining the lease, hence it precedes the grant of lease. Therefore, by no stretch of imagination can it be equated with rent which is paid periodically. The payment is also for FSI and additional built up area. This also cannot be equated with rent and so the assessee was under no obligation to deduct TDS u/s 194-I (Mukund Ltd. 106 ITD 231 referred)

See also Krishak Bharati Coop 350 ITR 24 (Del). Click here for more on s. 194-I TDS


(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

CIT vs. DLF Commercial Developers Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Exemption given in s. 43(5) to derivatives from being treated as "speculative transaction" not available to Expl to s. 73


Section 80-IB/80-IC: High Court Explains Entire Law On When Subsidy Is 'Derived From' The Undertaking

 

Dear Subscriber,


The following important judgement is available for download at the itatonline.org download center.


CIT vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd (Gauhati High Court)

S. 80-IB/80-IC: Subsidies that reduce the cost of production have a direct nexus with, and are "derived from", the industrial undertaking

The assessee set up an industrial undertaking which was eligible for deduction u/s 80-IB/ 80-IC. It received transport subsidy, interest subsidy, power subsidy and insurance subsidy pursuant to a scheme of the Government which was claimed to be eligible for deduction u/s 80-IB/80-IC. The AO & CIT(A) relied on Pandian Chemicals 262 ITR 278 (SC), Sterling Foods 237 ITR 579 & Liberty India 317 ITR 218 (SC) and rejected the claim on the ground that these subsidies were not "derived from" the undertaking as their immediate source was the Government's scheme and not the undertaking. However, the Tribunal allowed the claim on the ground that the subsidies reduced the corresponding expenses incurred and had a direct nexus with the manufacturing activities of the assessee. On appeal by the department to the High Court, HELD dismissing the appeal:

A subsidy given for the purpose of setting up of an industry is a capital receipt. A subsidy given for the purpose of operating an industry more profitably is revenue receipt. A distinction has to be drawn between a "non-operational subsidy" which does not relate to manufacture/ production and an "operational subsidy" which is intended to reduce the cost of manufacture/ production of the industrial undertaking. To determine whether the subsidy can be said to have been "derived from" the undertaking so as to be eligible for deduction u/s 80-IB & 80-IC it has to be seen whether there is a direct nexus between the said subsidy and the manufacturing process. A study of the schemes under which the said transport, interest, power & insurance subsidies were given shows that there were all intended to reduce the cost of production of the industrial undertaking. There is accordingly a direct nexus between the said subsidies and the profits of the industrial undertaking which is a "first degree nexus". The object of these subsidies is to increase profits and if they are taxed, the object will not be met. Liberty India 317 ITR 218 (SC) does not apply because the DEPB and Duty Drawback Schemes are "non-operational" incentives intended to encourage "export". DEPB and Duty Drawback is not provided as a means to reduce the cost of production of the industrial undertaking and so it has no nexus with the undertaking

See also J.K. Aluminium Co vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) where Liberty India 317 ITR 218 (SC) was distinguished

(Click Here To Read More)

 

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Dear Govt, Will You Act To Save ITAT Only After High Court Reprimands You?


Monday, July 22, 2013

ITR VOL 355 PART 3 AND ITR (TRIB) VOL 25 PART 2


 

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)--PRINT AND ONLINE EDITION

ONLINE EDITION

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

High Courts

Avoidance of tax --International transactions--No evidence of arrangement between assessee and its associated enterprises--Order of Transfer Pricing Officer--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961-- CIT v. Patni Computer Systems Ltd . (Bom) . . . 146

Exemption --Industrial undertaking--New industrial undertaking in free trade zone--Finding that new units established by assessee were separate and independent--Units entitled to exemption under section 10A--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- CIT v . Patni Computer Systems Ltd . (Bom) . . . 146

Double taxation avoidance --Loss--Set-off of loss--Loss incurred by branch office in Sweden can be set off against other business profits--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Sweden-- CIT v . Patni Computer Systems Ltd .
(Bom) . . . 146

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement --Non-resident--Permanent establishment in India--Liaison office in India--Evidence that liaison office carrying on commercial activities--Income from such activities--Assessable in India--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and South Korea-- Jebon Corporation v. CIT
(Karn) . . . 151

Housing project --Special deduction--Housing project--Definition--Eligible and ineligible units in composite housing project--Assessee entitled to proportionate deduction in respect of units satisfying the extent of built-up area--That one of blocks in units exceeding built-up area of 1,500 sq. ft.--Would not nullify claim of assessee for entire project--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80-IB(10)-- Viswas Promoters P. Ltd. v . Asst. CIT
(Mad) . . . 169

Reassessment --Validity--Notice within four years--Scope of section 147 and section 45(2)--Conversion of capital asset into stock-in-trade and subsequent sale--Gains assessable as capital gains--Failure to assess such capital gains--Reassessment valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 45, 147-- CIT v . National Tyres and Rubber Co. of India Ltd . (Ker) . . . 163

 

PRINT EDITION

ITR Volume 355 : Part 3 (Issue dated : 22-7-2013)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Business expenditure --Disallowance--Excessive and unreasonable payments--Payment to related person--Management fee--Payment to subsidiary company and not to director or relative of director--Section 40A(2)(b) not applicable--Subsidiary manufacturing goods for assessee and in view of labour unrest workers deployed for other purpose benefitting assessee--That subsidiary company not fulfilling its obligations would not render transaction illegal--Part of payment could not be disallowed--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 37, 40A(2)(b)-- CIT v. Raman Boards Ltd . (Karn) . . . 305

----General principles--Assessee manufacturing and exporting tea--Expenses on foreign travel of managers and their wives--Publicity expenses--Deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- CIT v. Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd . (Gauhati) . . . 323

Charitable purpose --Registration of trust--Certificate of registration--Effect of--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 12AA-- Agricultural Produce Market Committee v . ITO
(Guj) . . . 384

Charitable trust --Charitable purpose--Exemption--Conditions precedent--Registration--Newly established trust--Non-commencement of charitable activity not a ground for denying registration--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 12AA-- DIT v . Foundation of Ophthalmic and Optometry Research Education Centre (Delhi) . . . 361

Collection and use of bio-degradable waste for making briquettes --Special deduction under section 80JJA--Scope of section 80JJA--Special deduction not restricted to local bodies--Meaning of â€Å“collection†--Can be for consideration--Bagasse purchased by individual from sugar factory and used for making briquettes--Bagasse is â€Å“waste†--Assessee entitled to special deduction under section 80JJA--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80JJA-- CIT v. Smt. Padma S. Bora (Bom) . . . 368

Export --Special deduction--Computation of profits--Business profits should be reduced by unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed losses--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHE-- CIT v . Novell Software Development (I) Pvt. Ltd . (Karn) . . . 339

Export of computer software --Special deduction--Gain from fluctuation of foreign exchange--Ninety per cent. of amount not excludible in arriving at profits of business--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 80HHE-- CIT v . Novell Software Development (I) Pvt. Ltd.
(Karn) . . . 339

Income from house property --Annual value--Determination of annual value--Interest on security deposit cannot be added--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 23-- CIT v. Shastha Pharma Laboratories P. Ltd . (Karn) . . . 316

Penalty --Loan in excess of specified limit in cash--Finding by Tribunal that explanation of assessee not reasonable--Finding of fact--Imposition of penalty--Valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 271D-- Auto Piston Mfg. Co. P. Ltd . v . CIT
(P&H) . . . 414

Reassessment --Assessee, dealer in securities, making provision for purchases on short sales and reversing provision as and when sales completed--Objection of Revenue audit party to allowance of provision--Internal correspondence showing Assessing Officer not agreeing with objection and holding provision allowable--Notice for reassessment issued notwithstanding--No material to indicate subjective satisfaction of Assessing Officer--Notice on basis of audit objection not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Jagat Jayantilal Parikh v . Dy. CIT (Guj) . . . 400

----Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued beyond period of six years to assessee without giving it opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148, 149, 150-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 1 )
(Delhi) . . . 345

----Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued to assessee without giving him opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148, 149, 150-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Notice--Condition precedent--Belief that income has escaped assessment--Belief should be that of Assessing Officer--Notice based on opinion of Revenue audit party and not that of Assessing Officer--Condition not fulfilled--Reassessment not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. ITO (Guj) . . . 384

----Notice--Exemption--Long-term capital gains of infrastructure capital fund or company--Provision that investee company has to have approval under section 10(23G)--Investee company obtaining approval under section 10(23G)--Reopening of assessment requiring assessee, an investor company, to furnish approval not justified--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- RPG Cellular Investment and Holdings (P.) Ltd . v . Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

----Notice after four years--Conditions precedent--No indication in reasons recorded about failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment--Revenue not entitled to raise question relating to expenses being of a capital nature, which assessee claimed as revenue--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Notice after four years--No failure to disclose material facts by assessee--Objection raised by audit party considered during original assessment--Notice at the insistence of audit party--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Cadila Healthcare Ltd . v. Asst. CIT (OSD) (Guj) . . . 393

Recovery of tax --Interest--Delay in filing return--Interest under section 234A--Part of tax paid before return was due--Interest could not be levied on such part payment--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 234A-- Bharatbhai B. Shah v . ITO (Guj) . . . 373

Search and seizure --Block assessment--Limitation--Undisclosed income--Special audit--Direction for special audit without giving opportunity to assessee--Direction given to extend period of limitation--Assessment barred by limitation--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 142(2A), 158BC-- CIT v. Subboji Rao C. H . (Karn) . . . 320

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 12AA --Charitable purpose--Registration of trust--Certificate of registration--Effect of-- Agricultural Produce Market Committee v . ITO (Guj) . . . 384

----Charitable trust--Charitable purpose--Exemption--Conditions precedent--Registration--Newly established trust--Non-commencement of charitable activity not a ground for denying registration-- DIT v . Foundation of Ophthalmic and Optometry Research Education Centre (Delhi) . . . 361

S. 23 --Income from house property--Annual value--Determination of annual value--Interest on security deposit cannot be added-- CIT v. Shastha Pharma Laboratories P. Ltd . (Karn) . . . 316

S. 37 --Business expenditure--Disallowance--Excessive and unreasonable payments--Payment to related person--Management fee--Payment to subsidiary company and not to director or relative of director--Section 40A(2)(b) not applicable--Subsidiary manufacturing goods for assessee and in view of labour unrest workers deployed for other purpose benefitting assessee--That subsidiary company not fulfilling its obligations would not render transaction illegal--Part of payment could not be disallowed-- CIT v. Raman Boards Ltd . (Karn) . . . 305

----Business expenditure--General principles--Assessee manufacturing and exporting tea--Expenses on foreign travel of managers and their wives--Publicity expenses--Deductible-- CIT v. Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd . (Gauhati) . . . 323

S. 40A(2)(b) --Business expenditure--Disallowance--Excessive and unreasonable payments--Payment to related person--Management fee--Payment to subsidiary company and not to director or relative of director--Section 40A(2)(b) not applicable--Subsidiary manufacturing goods for assessee and in view of labour unrest workers deployed for other purpose benefitting assessee--That subsidiary company not fulfilling its obligations would not render transaction illegal--Part of payment could not be disallowed-- CIT v. Raman Boards Ltd . (Karn) . . . 305

S. 80HHE --Export--Special deduction--Computation of profits--Business profits should be reduced by unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed losses-- CIT v . Novell Software Development (I) Pvt. Ltd . (Karn) . . . 339

----Export of computer software--Special deduction--Gain from fluctuation of foreign exchange--Ninety per cent. of amount not excludible in arriving at profits of business-- CIT v . Novell Software Development (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Karn) . . . 339

S. 80JJA --Collection and use of bio-degradable waste for making briquettes--Special deduction under section 80JJA--Scope of section 80JJA--Special deduction not restricted to local bodies--Meaning of â€Å“collection†--Can be for consideration--Bagasse purchased by individual from sugar factory and used for making briquettes--Bagasse is â€Å“waste†--Assessee entitled to special deduction under section 80JJA-- CIT v. Smt. Padma S. Bora
(Bom) . . . 368

S. 142(2A) --Search and seizure--Block assessment--Limitation--Undisclosed income--Special audit--Direction for special audit without giving opportunity to assessee--Direction given to extend period of limitation--Assessment barred by limitation-- CIT v. Subboji Rao C. H . (Karn) . . . 320

S. 147 --Reassessment--Assessee, dealer in securities, making provision for purchases on short sales and reversing provision as and when sales completed--Objection of Revenue audit party to allowance of provision--Internal correspondence showing Assessing Officer not agreeing with objection and holding provision allowable--Notice for reassessment issued notwithstanding--No material to indicate subjective satisfaction of Assessing Officer--Notice on basis of audit objection not valid-- Jagat Jayantilal Parikh v . Dy. CIT (Guj) . . . 400

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued beyond period of six years to assessee without giving it opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 345

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued to assessee without giving him opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Reassessment--Notice--Condition precedent--Belief that income has escaped assessment--Belief should be that of Assessing Officer--Notice based on opinion of Revenue audit party and not that of Assessing Officer--Condition not fulfilled--Reassessment not valid-- Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. ITO (Guj) . . . 384

----Reassessment--Notice--Exemption--Long-term capital gains of infrastructure capital fund or company--Provision that investee company has to have approval under section 10(23G)--Investee company obtaining approval under section 10(23G)--Reopening of assessment requiring assessee, an investor company, to furnish approval not justified-- RPG Cellular Investment and Holdings (P.) Ltd . v . Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 310

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Conditions precedent--No indication in reasons recorded about failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment--Revenue not entitled to raise question relating to expenses being of a capital nature, which assessee claimed as revenue-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--No failure to disclose material facts by assessee--Objection raised by audit party considered during original assessment--Notice at the insistence of audit party--Not valid-- Cadila Healthcare Ltd . v. Asst. CIT (OSD) (Guj) . . . 393

S. 148 --Reassessment--Assessee, dealer in securities, making provision for purchases on short sales and reversing provision as and when sales completed--Objection of Revenue audit party to allowance of provision--Internal correspondence showing Assessing Officer not agreeing with objection and holding provision allowable--Notice for reassessment issued notwithstanding--No material to indicate subjective satisfaction of Assessing Officer--Notice on basis of audit objection not valid-- Jagat Jayantilal Parikh v . Dy. CIT (Guj) . . . 400

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued beyond period of six years to assessee without giving it opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT ( No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 345

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued to assessee without giving him opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Reassessment--Notice--Condition precedent--Belief that income has escaped assessment--Belief should be that of Assessing Officer--Notice based on opinion of Revenue audit party and not that of Assessing Officer--Condition not fulfilled--Reassessment not valid-- Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. ITO (Guj) . . . 384

----Reassessment--Notice--Exemption--Long-term capital gains of infrastructure capital fund or company--Provision that investee company has to have approval under section 10(23G)--Investee company obtaining approval under section 10(23G)--Reopening of assessment requiring assessee, an investor company, to furnish approval not justified-- RPG Cellular Investment and Holdings (P.) Ltd . v . Asst. CIT
(Delhi) . . . 310

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Conditions precedent--No indication in reasons recorded about failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment--Revenue not entitled to raise question relating to expenses being of a capital nature, which assessee claimed as revenue-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--No failure to disclose material facts by assessee--Objection raised by audit party considered during original assessment--Notice at the insistence of audit party--Not valid-- Cadila Healthcare Ltd . v. Asst. CIT (OSD) (Guj) . . . 393

S. 149 --Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued beyond period of six years to assessee without giving it opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT ( No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 345

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued to assessee without giving him opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

S. 150 --Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued beyond period of six years to assessee without giving it opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 1 ) (Delhi) . . . 345

----Reassessment--Limitation--Exclusion from limitation--Reassessment of income of assessee in pursuance of order of appellate authority in case of third party--Condition precedent for exclusion from limitation--Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard--Assessee giving loans to society--Society creating special corpus fund and earning interest but not disclosing interest in returns--Order of Tribunal on appeal by society that interest belonged to assessee--Notice of reassessment issued to assessee without giving him opportunity to be heard--Notice barred by time-- Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd . v . CIT (No. 2 ) (Delhi) . . . 356

S. 158BC --Search and seizure--Block assessment--Limitation--Undisclosed income--Special audit--Direction for special audit without giving opportunity to assessee--Direction given to extend period of limitation--Assessment barred by limitation-- CIT v. Subboji Rao C. H . (Karn) . . . 320

S. 234A --Recovery of tax--Interest--Delay in filing return--Interest under section 234A--Part of tax paid before return was due--Interest could not be levied on such part payment-- Bharatbhai B. Shah v . ITO (Guj) . . . 373

S. 271D --Penalty--Loan in excess of specified limit in cash--Finding by Tribunal that explanation of assessee not reasonable--Finding of fact--Imposition of penalty--Valid-- Auto Piston Mfg. Co. P. Ltd . v . CIT (P&H) . . . 414

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB)) -- PRINT AND ONLINE EDITION

 

ONLINE EDITION

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

Business expenditure --Disallowance--Payments liable to deduction of tax at source--Payment to non-resident outside India of advertisement expenditure in foreign currency--Non-resident not having permanent establishment in India--Remittance not liable to tax--Disallowance not justified--Expenditure incurred on advertisement on television films and commercial as well as other promotional films--Revenue in nature--Whether expenditure on advertisement incurred on product which was registered in assessee̢۪s name--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 37(1), 40(a)(i)--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Switzerland, art. 22(1)-- Sandoz P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 100

----Interest on borrowed capital--Allowable expenditure--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 36(1)(iii)-- Sandoz P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 100

Capital or revenue expenditure --Purchase of software including various packages and licence copy of software--Whether assessee obtained benefit of enduring nature--Matter remanded--Lease rent--Relevant documents and lease agreement not produced--Matter remanded-- Sandoz P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 100

Export --Special deduction--Computation--Exclusion of excise duty from total turnover--Proper--Liability no longer required--Not liable to be reduced to extent of ninety per cent. while calculating eligible profits--Other income--Amounts realised from sale of scarp--Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for deciding afresh--Profits from statistical data processing activity--Deduction claimed under section 80HHE to be reduced and not 100 per cent. of profit--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80HHC, Expln. (baa) , 80HHE-- Sandoz P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 100

Method of accounting --Valuation of stock--Closing stock increased on account of unutilised Modvat credit--Corresponding opening stock of that year should also be increased-- Sandoz P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 100

 

PRINT EDITION

Volume 25 : Part 2 (Issue dated : 22-7-2013)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

Charitable purpose --Exemption--Assessee running educational school and constructing a building--Reference to District Valuation Officer to estimate actual investment in construction of building--Huge difference between amount claimed to have been spent on construction and estimation made by District Valuation Officer--No evidence on record that construction cost used by managing trustee for his personal benefit--Building belonging to society and benefit going to society not managing trustee--No violation of section 13--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 13-- Shri Amol Chand Varshney Sewa Sansthan v. Additional CIT (Agra) . . . 211

Exemption --Educational institution--Contributions to Lions Club and Fine Arts Academy--Lions Club is a social club, not social organisation to undertake social work as envisaged in study curriculum--Failure to furnish explanation regarding contributions to Fine Arts Academy--Exemption not allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10(23C)(iiiab)-- Ganapathy Educational Trust v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (Exemption) (Chennai) . . . 231

International transaction --Transfer pricing--Arm’s length price--Determination--Transactional net margin method--Profit margin from transactions with associated enterprises and profit margin from similar transactions with non-associated enterprises--To be separately derived--No overlapping permissible--Figures of associated enterprise transactions including non-associated enterprise transactions--Not proper--Operating cost--Amortisation of value of investment--Depreciation transferred from revaluation reserve--Expenditure capitalised--Bill discounting--Fixed assets written off--Donations--Items not includible in operating cost--Uncontrolled transaction--Filter--Related party transactions not exceeding 25 per cent. of total revenue--Government company not comparable--± 5 per cent. not a standard deduction--Benefit of up to 5 per cent. allowable only if variation between price of international transaction and arm’s length price determined not exceed 5 per cent.--Payment of royalty and technical fee to associated enterprise pursuant to deemed approval by Reserve Bank of India under automatic approval scheme--Arm’s length price cannot be computed at nil--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 92B(1), 92C--Income-tax Rules, 1962, r. 10B(1)(e)-- ThyssenKrupp Industries India P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 243

----Arm̢۪s length price--Determination--Selection of comparables--Companies which have suffered merger or demerger, impacting financial results, those having supernormal profit, those functionally dissimilar, those acting as intermediary having outsourced their activity, those whose directors involved in fraud, those whose turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores not to be treated as comparables--Matter remanded to determine arm̢۪s length price afresh--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 92C-- Capital IQ Information Systems (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (International Taxation) (Hyderabad) . . . 185

----Transfer pricing--Computation of arm̢۪s length price--Foreign exchange fluctuation cannot be excluded in reckoning operating margin--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 92CA-- Capital IQ Information Systems (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (International Taxation) (Hyderabad) . . . 185

Non-resident --Fringe benefits tax--Existence of employer-employee relationship necessary to invoke section 115WA--Non-resident company engaging consultants on retainership basis for its projects in India--Tax deducted at source under section 194C or 194J--Such persons not eligible for retirement or superannuation or gratuity benefits--Fringe benefits tax not attracted--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 115WA, 194C, 194J--Circular No. 8 of 2005 dated 29-8-2005-- Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Ahmedabad) . . . 170

Search and seizure --Block assessment--Set off and carry forward of losses--Bar applies to losses arising from transactions accounted for--Losses of block period from unaccounted transactions can be set off--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 158BC-- Heatshrink Technologies Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Mumbai) . . . 269

----Block assessment--Undisclosed income--Matters finalised in proceedings following income-tax survey not to be considered in block assessment--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 158BC-- Heatshrink Technologies Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Mumbai) . . . 269

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 10(23C)(iiiab) --Exemption--Educational institution--Contributions to Lions Club and Fine Arts Academy--Lions Club is a social club, not social organisation to undertake social work as envisaged in study curriculum--Failure to furnish explanation regarding contributions to Fine Arts Academy--Exemption not allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, Ganapathy Educational Trust v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (Exemption) (Chennai) . . . 231

S. 13 --Charitable purpose--Exemption--Assessee running educational school and constructing a building--Reference to District Valuation Officer to estimate actual investment in construction of building--Huge difference between amount claimed to have been spent on construction and estimation made by District Valuation Officer--No evidence on record that construction cost used by managing trustee for his personal benefit--Building belonging to society and benefit going to society not managing trustee--No violation of section 13-- Shri Amol Chand Varshney Sewa Sansthan v. Additional CIT (Agra) . . . 211

S. 92B(1) --International transaction--Transfer pricing--Arm’s length price--Determination--Transactional net margin method--Profit margin from transactions with associated enterprises and profit margin from similar transactions with non-associated enterprises--To be separately derived--No overlapping permissible--Figures of associated enterprise transactions including non-associated enterprise transactions--Not proper--Operating cost--Amortisation of value of investment--Depreciation transferred from revaluation reserve--Expenditure capitalised--Bill discounting--Fixed assets written off--Donations--Items not includible in operating cost--Uncontrolled transaction--Filter--Related party transactions not exceeding 25 per cent. of total revenue--Government company not comparable--± 5 per cent. not a standard deduction--Benefit of up to 5 per cent. allowable only if variation between price of international transaction and arm’s length price determined not exceed 5 per cent.--Payment of royalty and technical fee to associated enterprise pursuant to deemed approval by Reserve Bank of India under automatic approval scheme--Arm’s length price cannot be computed at nil-- ThyssenKrupp Industries India P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 243

S. 92C --International transactions--Arm̢۪s length price--Determination--Selection of comparables--Companies which have suffered merger or demerger, impacting financial results, those having supernormal profit, those functionally dissimilar, those acting as intermediary having outsourced their activity, those whose directors involved in fraud, those whose turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores not to be treated as comparables--Matter remanded to determine arm̢۪s length price afresh-- Capital IQ Information Systems (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (International Taxation) (Hyderabad) . . . 185

----International transaction--Transfer pricing--Arm’s length price--Determination--Transactional net margin method--Profit margin from transactions with associated enterprises and profit margin from similar transactions with non-associated enterprises--To be separately derived--No overlapping permissible--Figures of associated enterprise transactions including non-associated enterprise transactions--Not proper--Operating cost--Amortisation of value of investment--Depreciation transferred from revaluation reserve--Expenditure capitalised--Bill discounting--Fixed assets written off--Donations--Items not includible in operating cost--Uncontrolled transaction--Filter--Related party transactions not exceeding 25 per cent. of total revenue--Government company not comparable--± 5 per cent. not a standard deduction--Benefit of up to 5 per cent. allowable only if variation between price of international transaction and arm’s length price determined not exceed 5 per cent.--Payment of royalty and technical fee to associated enterprise pursuant to deemed approval by Reserve Bank of India under automatic approval scheme--Arm’s length price cannot be computed at nil-- ThyssenKrupp Industries India P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 243

S. 92CA --International transactions--Transfer pricing--Computation of arm̢۪s length price--Foreign exchange fluctuation cannot be excluded in reckoning operating margin-- Capital IQ Information Systems (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (International Taxation) (Hyderabad) . . . 185

S. 115WA --Non-resident--Fringe benefits tax--Existence of employer-employee relationship necessary to invoke section 115WA--Non-resident company engaging consultants on retainership basis for its projects in India--Tax deducted at source under section 194C or 194J--Such persons not eligible for retirement or superannuation or gratuity benefits--Fringe benefits tax not attracted-- Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Ahmedabad) . . . 170

S. 158BC --Search and seizure--Block assessment--Set off and carry forward of losses--Bar applies to losses arising from transactions accounted for--Losses of block period from unaccounted transactions can be set off-- Heatshrink Technologies Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Mumbai) . . . 269

----Search and seizure--Block assessment--Undisclosed income--Matters finalised in proceedings following income-tax survey not to be considered in block assessment-- Heatshrink Technologies Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Mumbai) . . . 269

S. 194C --Non-resident--Fringe benefits tax--Existence of employer-employee relationship necessary to invoke section 115WA--Non-resident company engaging consultants on retainership basis for its projects in India--Tax deducted at source under section 194C or 194J--Such persons not eligible for retirement or superannuation or gratuity benefits--Fringe benefits tax not attracted-- Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Ahmedabad) . . . 170

S. 194J --Non-resident--Fringe benefits tax--Existence of employer-employee relationship necessary to invoke section 115WA--Non-resident company engaging consultants on retainership basis for its projects in India--Tax deducted at source under section 194C or 194J--Such persons not eligible for retirement or superannuation or gratuity benefits--Fringe benefits tax not attracted-- Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (Ahmedabad) . . . 170

Income-tax Rules, 1962 :

R. 10B(1)(e) --International transaction--Transfer pricing--Arm’s length price--Determination--Transactional net margin method--Profit margin from transactions with associated enterprises and profit margin from similar transactions with non-associated enterprises--To be separately derived--No overlapping permissible--Figures of associated enterprise transactions including non-associated enterprise transactions--Not proper--Operating cost--Amortisation of value of investment--Depreciation transferred from revaluation reserve--Expenditure capitalised--Bill discounting--Fixed assets written off--Donations--Items not includible in operating cost--Uncontrolled transaction--Filter--Related party transactions not exceeding 25 per cent. of total revenue--Government company not comparable--± 5 per cent. not a standard deduction--Benefit of up to 5 per cent. allowable only if variation between price of international transaction and arm’s length price determined not exceed 5 per cent.--Payment of royalty and technical fee to associated enterprise pursuant to deemed approval by Reserve Bank of India under automatic approval scheme--Arm’s length price cannot be computed at nil-- ThyssenKrupp Industries India P. Ltd. v. Additional CIT (Mumbai) . . . 243