Pages

Friday, August 22, 2014

Analysis Of An Important Judgement On International Taxation

 

Dear Subscriber,

Analysis Of An Important Judgement On International Taxation

A recent verdict of the Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) has created a controversy over the role of a Protocol in interpreting Tax Treaties, in the context of the "Most Favoured Nation" (MFN) clause. The author has conducted a careful analysis of the judgement, explained its implications and provided valuable guidance on the way forward


Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest

Transfer / Posting Of Additional / Joint Commissioners of Income-tax

Vide Order No. 136 of 2014 dated 20.08.2014, the CBDT has ordered the transfer and posting of several officers in the grade of Additional/ Joint Commissioners of Income-tax with immediate effect and until further orders


CBDT Order u/s 119 Extending Due Date For Filing Tax Audit Report For AY 2014-15

Dear Sir/ Madam,

 

Please find attached CBDT Order u/s 119 Extending Due Date For Filing TAR For AY 2014-15 :

In exercise of power conferred by section 119 of the Income-tax Act ('the Act'), the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) hereby extends the due date for obtaining and furnishing of the report of audit under section 44AB of the Act for Assessment Year 2014-15 in case of assessees who are not required to furnish report under section 92E of the Act from 30th day of September, 2014 to 30th November, 2014

 

 


Wednesday, August 20, 2014

ITR Volume 366 : Part 2 (Issue dated : 18-8-2014)

 

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)--PRINT AND ONLINE EDITION

ONLINE EDITION

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

New Return Forms 
ITR-3, ITR-4, ITR-5, ITR-6 and ITR-7

(See [2014] 3 ITR-OL (St.) 1)

 

PRINT EDITION

ITR Volume 366 : Part 2 (Issue dated : 18-8-2014)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Business expenditure --Appeal to High Court--Concurrent findings by Assessing Officer, Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal that certain expenses were not deductible--Finding based on evidence--High Court could not set aside findings--Expenses not deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 260A-- Liberty Footwear Co. v. CIT (P&H) . . . 250

----Burden of proof--Assessee failing to avail of opportunity in assessment proceedings to cross-examine persons whose statements relied upon by Inspector--Assessment completed after obtaining assessee’s response to contents of Inspector’s report--No prejudice caused to assessee--Claim at appellate stage that assessee not allowed to cross-examine persons not tenable--No record of individual shops where assessee distributed sampling display--Remand of case in facts not necessary--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37(1)--Hindusthan Tobacco Co. v. CIT (Cal) . . . 282

----Deduction only on actual payment--Employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State insurance not credited to accounts of employees relevant funds within due dates as specified in section 36(1)(va)--Amounts not deductible--Amendment of section 43B by Finance Act, 2003, has not changed the law--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 36(1)(va), 43B-- CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (Guj) . . . 170

----Deduction only on actual payment--Employer’s and employees’ contributions to employees’ State insurance and provident fund deposited prior to filing of return--Allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 43B-- CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P.) Ltd. (P&H) . . . 167

----Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund and employees’ State insurance contributions made before filing return--Allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 43B-- CIT v. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (Raj) . . . 163

Cash credits --Burden of proof--Burden on assessee to prove genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of depositor--Burden discharged by assessee--No enquiry by Assessing Officer under section 131--Credits not assessable as income of assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 68-- CIT v. Varinder Rawlley (P&H) . . . 232

----Identity of creditors, their creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions proved--No addition could be made under section 68--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 68-- CIT v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal (Raj) . . . 217

Income --Capital or revenue receipt--Termination of lease of business asset--Compensation towards loss of revenue and non-compete fee under agreement in March 1993--Capital receipt--Income-tax Act, 1961-- CIT v. Sapthagiri Distilleries Ltd. (Karn) . . . 270

Income from undisclosed sources --Amounts claimed to be gifts--Facts showing gifts not genuine--Additions of such amounts to income--Justified--Income-tax Act, 1961-- CIT v.Narinder Kumar Sekhri (P&H) . . . 225

----Gift--Burden of proof is on assessee--Identity of donor--Capacity of donor to gift--Genuineness of transaction--Gift by cheque or draft through banking channels--Not sufficient--Unaccounted cash of assessee deposited in different accounts in an organized manner, from where transfer entries given to donors, who at the same time made entries in favour of assessee by way of bank drafts--Amounts claimed as gift--Gifts without any occasion or out of love and affection--Addition of gift amounts justified--Addition of ten per cent. for notional premium paid to middlemen not proper--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 68-- CIT v.Y. M. Singla (P&H) . . . 242

Penalty --Concealment of income--Furnishing of inaccurate particulars--No false claim by assessee--Claim found to be incorrect--No mens rea on part of assessee to claim deduction--Divergent judicial opinions on claim made by assessee--Debatable issue--Penalty cannot be imposed--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80-IB, 271(1)(c)-- CIT v. Tudor Knitting Works P. Ltd.(P&H) . . . 236

Reassessment --Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Validity of reassessment--Assessment of capital gains in assessment year 1999-2000--Reassessment based on guidance value of residential land in Government circular dated 10-11-1982--Tribunal not right in setting aside reassessment on the sole ground that Assessing Officer wrong in relying on circular--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- CIT v. M. L. Sridhar (Karn) . . . 267

----Notice after four years--Condition precedent--Approval by Chief Commissioner or Commissioner--No evidence of such approval--Notice not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148, 151-- CIT v. H. M. Constructions (Karn) . . . 277

----Notice after four years--Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Information from CBI that loans accepted as genuine in original assessment were bogus--Notice valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Yogendrakumar Gupta v. ITO (Guj) . . . 186

Rectification of mistakes --Mistake apparent from record--Loss--Carry forward and set off--Assessing Officer allowing set off of long-term capital loss of earlier year against long-term capital gains of subsequent year --Loss of earlier year not determined in pursuance of return filed under section 139(3) within time allowed under section 139(1) for that year--Permitting set off of such losses in subsequent years is mistake apparent from record--Rectification valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 139(1), (3), 154-- Rajiv Gupta v. CIT (P&H) . . . 257

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(24)(x) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Employer’s and employees’ contributions to employees’ State insurance and provident fund deposited prior to filing of return--Allowable-- CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P.) Ltd. (P&H) . . . 167

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund and employees’ State insurance contributions made before filing return--Allowable-- CIT v.Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (Raj) . . . 163

S. 36(1)(va) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State insurance not credited to accounts of employees relevant funds within due dates as specified in section 36(1)(va)--Amounts not deductible--Amendment of section 43B by Finance Act, 2003, has not changed the law-- CITv. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (Guj) . . . 170

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Employer’s and employees’ contributions to employees’ State insurance and provident fund deposited prior to filing of return--Allowable-- CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P.) Ltd. (P&H) . . . 167

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund and employees’ State insurance contributions made before filing return--Allowable-- CIT v.Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (Raj) . . . 163

S. 37(1) --Business expenditure--Burden of proof--Assessee failing to avail of opportunity in assessment proceedings to cross-examine persons whose statements relied upon by Inspector--Assessment completed after obtaining assessee’s response to contents of Inspector’s report--No prejudice caused to assessee--Claim at appellate stage that assessee not allowed to cross-examine persons not tenable--No record of individual shops where assessee distributed sampling display--Remand of case in facts not necessary--Hindusthan Tobacco Co. v. CIT (Cal) . . . 282

S. 43B --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State insurance not credited to accounts of employees relevant funds within due dates as specified in section 36(1)(va)--Amounts not deductible--Amendment of section 43B by Finance Act, 2003, has not changed the law-- CITv. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (Guj) . . . 170

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Employer’s and employees’ contributions to employees’ State insurance and provident fund deposited prior to filing of return--Allowable-- CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P.) Ltd. (P&H) . . . 167

----Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund and employees’ State insurance contributions made before filing return--Allowable-- CIT v.Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (Raj) . . . 163

S. 68 --Cash credits--Burden of proof--Burden on assessee to prove genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of depositor--Burden discharged by assessee--No enquiry by Assessing Officer under section 131--Credits not assessable as income of assessee--CIT v. Varinder Rawlley (P&H) . . . 232

----Cash credits--Identity of creditors, their creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions proved--No addition could be made under section 68-- CIT v. Jai Kumar Bakliwal (Raj) . . . 217

----Income from undisclosed sources--Gift--Burden of proof is on assessee--Identity of donor--Capacity of donor to gift--Genuineness of transaction--Gift by cheque or draft through banking channels--Not sufficient--Unaccounted cash of assessee deposited in different accounts in an organized manner, from where transfer entries given to donors, who at the same time made entries in favour of assessee by way of bank drafts--Amounts claimed as gift--Gifts without any occasion or out of love and affection--Addition of gift amounts justified--Addition of ten per cent. for notional premium paid to middlemen not proper-- CIT v. Y. M. Singla (P&H) . . . 242

S. 80-IB --Penalty--Concealment of income--Furnishing of inaccurate particulars--No false claim by assessee--Claim found to be incorrect--No mens rea on part of assessee to claim deduction--Divergent judicial opinions on claim made by assessee--Debatable issue--Penalty cannot be imposed-- CIT v. Tudor Knitting Works P. Ltd. (P&H) . . . 236

S. 139(1), (3) --Rectification of mistakes--Mistake apparent from record--Loss--Carry forward and set off--Assessing Officer allowing set off of long-term capital loss of earlier year against long-term capital gains of subsequent year--Loss of earlier year not determined in pursuance of return filed under section 139(3) within time allowed under section 139(1) for that year--Permitting set off of such losses in subsequent years is mistake apparent from record--Rectification valid-- Rajiv Gupta v. CIT (P&H) . . . 257

S. 147 --Reassessment--Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Validity of reassessment--Assessment of capital gains in assessment year 1999-2000--Reassessment based on guidance value of residential land in Government circular dated 10-11-1982--Tribunal not right in setting aside reassessment on the sole ground that Assessing Officer wrong in relying on circular--Matter remanded-- CIT v. M. L. Sridhar (Karn) . . . 267

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Condition precedent--Approval by Chief Commissioner or Commissioner--No evidence of such approval--Notice not valid-- CIT v. H. M. Constructions (Karn) . . . 277

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Information from CBI that loans accepted as genuine in original assessment were bogus--Notice valid-- Yogendrakumar Gupta v. ITO (Guj) . . . 186

S. 148 --Reassessment--Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Validity of reassessment--Assessment of capital gains in assessment year 1999-2000--Reassessment based on guidance value of residential land in Government circular dated 10-11-1982--Tribunal not right in setting aside reassessment on the sole ground that Assessing Officer wrong in relying on circular--Matter remanded-- CIT v. M. L. Sridhar (Karn) . . . 267

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Condition precedent--Approval by Chief Commissioner or Commissioner--No evidence of such approval--Notice not valid-- CIT v. H. M. Constructions (Karn) . . . 277

----Reassessment--Notice after four years--Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Information from CBI that loans accepted as genuine in original assessment were bogus--Notice valid-- Yogendrakumar Gupta v. ITO (Guj) . . . 186

S. 151 --Reassessment--Notice after four years--Condition precedent--Approval by Chief Commissioner or Commissioner--No evidence of such approval--Notice not valid-- CIT v. H. M. Constructions (Karn) . . . 277

S. 154 --Rectification of mistakes--Mistake apparent from record--Loss--Carry forward and set off--Assessing Officer allowing set off of long-term capital loss of earlier year against long-term capital gains of subsequent year --Loss of earlier year not determined in pursuance of return filed under section 139(3) within time allowed under section 139(1) for that year--Permitting set off of such losses in subsequent years is mistake apparent from record--Rectification valid-- Rajiv Gupta v. CIT (P&H) . . . 257

S. 260A --Business expenditure--Appeal to High Court--Concurrent findings by Assessing Officer, Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal that certain expenses were not deductible--Finding based on evidence--High Court could not set aside findings--Expenses not deductible-- Liberty Footwear Co. v. CIT (P&H) . . . 250

S. 271(1)(c) --Penalty--Concealment of income--Furnishing of inaccurate particulars--No false claim by assessee--Claim found to be incorrect--No mens rea on part of assessee to claim deduction--Divergent judicial opinions on claim made by assessee--Debatable issue--Penalty cannot be imposed-- CIT v. Tudor Knitting Works P. Ltd. (P&H) . . . 236

 

__._,_.___

RBI Circular _ Usage of ATMs - Rationalisation of number of free transactions_dated 14/08/2014


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anisa Shaikh <anisas@ssrane.net>

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Please find attached file of RBI Circular dated 14-08-2014 issued in respect of :

 

Usage of ATMs – Rationalisation of number of free transactions

 

a)    The number of mandatory free ATM transactions for savings bank account customers at other banks' ATMs is reduced from the present five to three transactions per month (inclusive of both financial and non-financial transactions) for transactions done at the ATMs located in the six metro centres, viz. Mumbai, New Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru and Hyderabad.

 

b)    This reduction will, however, not apply to small / no frills / Basic Savings Bank Deposit account holders who will continue to enjoy five free transactions, as hitherto.

 

c)    At other locations i.e. other than the six metro centres mentioned above, the present facility of five free transactions for savings bank account customers shall remain unchanged.

 

d)    Banks are advised that at least five free transactions (inclusive of financial and non financial transactions) per month should be permitted to the savings bank account customers for use of own bank ATMs at all locations. Beyond this, banks may put in place appropriate Board approved policy relating to charges for customers for use of own bank ATMs.   

 

e)    The ceiling / cap on customer charges of Rs.20/- per transaction (plus service tax, if any) will be applicable. And Banks are advised to ensure that the charges structure on ATM transactions is informed to the customer in fair and transparent manner.

 

 This directive shall come into effect from November 01, 2014

 

 

Best Regards,

CA. Anisa Mohd. Irfan Shaikh


Tuesday, August 19, 2014

ITR (TRIB)Volume 32 : Part 4 (Issue dated : 23-6-2014)


 

 

 

 

Subject Index - ITR's Tribunal Tax Reports (ITR (Trib))

 

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))--PRINT AND ONLINE EDITION

ONLINE EDITION

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

Exemption --Interest on foreign borrowings--Tax-free bonds--Expenditure in relation to income not includible in total income--Exemption under section 10(15) available on gross amount of interest--No current fresh investment in bonds fetching exempt income--No interest can be disallowed under section 14A--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 10(15), 14A--Deputy DIT (International Taxation) v. Development Bank of Singapore (Mumbai) . . . 776

Export --Exemption--Assessing Officer to verify receipts of assessee from associated enterprises--Amount not be added back to cost base if mere recovery of expenses without services--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- Virtusa (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 754

----Exemption--Computation of deduction--Communication charges to be reduced from both export turnover and total turnover--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- Adaptec (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 744

----Exemption--Computation of deduction--Total turnover--Reimbursement of expenses--To be reduced from both export turnover and total turnover--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A--Virtusa (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 754

----Exemption--Disallowance of benefit under section 10A to second unit on ground of reconstruction of business already in existence--Benefit granted in earlier assessment years--Assessing Officer to allow benefit under section 10A to second unit--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- Virtusa (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 754

----Exemption--Reimbursement of expenses--Amount cannot be added to income of assessee if foreign inward remittance certificate towards reimbursement amount was within stipulated time--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- Virtusa (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 754

International transactions --Arm’s length price--Computation--Selection of comparables--Giant companies having extraordinary turnover to be excluded--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 92CA-- Adaptec (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 744

----Arm’s length price--Determination--Comparable uncontrolled price method--Transactions benchmarked on basis LIBOR rates--LIBOR an arithmetical mean of several rates not a single rate--Benefit of plus or minus 5 per cent. variation available to assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Deputy DIT (International Taxation) v. Development Bank of Singapore (Mumbai) . . . 776

----Arm’s length price--Determination--Head office expenses--Proof of documentary evidence to substantiate rendering of service--Bills issued on audit fees and head office expenses, details regarding allocation of expenses and a copy of assessee's letter to Transfer Pricing Officer sufficient to prove benefit--Transfer Pricing Officer not entitled to take payment at nil--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Deputy DIT (International Taxation) v. Development Bank of Singapore (Mumbai) . . . 776

----Arm’s length price--Determination--Selection of comparables--Companies earning revenue from both software development services and products, giant companies having diversified activities and huge turnover, companies failing in employee cost filter and related party transaction filter to be excluded from comparables--Only segmental margin of comparable company in relevant previous year to be considered--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 92CA-- Virtusa (India) P. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 754

Non-resident --Deduction for head office expenses--Expenses incurred by head office exclusively for Indian branch--Allowable in full--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 44C-- Deputy DIT (International Taxation) v. Development Bank of Singapore (Mumbai) . . . 776

Refund --Interest on excess refund--Interest to be calculated from date of granting of refund not from date of receipt of refund--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 234D, 244A-- Deputy DIT (International Taxation) v. Development Bank of Singapore (Mumbai) . . . 776

 

PRINT EDITION

Volume 32 : Part 4 (Issue dated : 23-6-2014)

SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED

Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) --Appealable orders--Assessment--Assessing Officer--Jurisdiction--No appeal lies on ground of lack of jurisdiction--Commissioner (Appeals) has no power to entertain additional ground on question of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 246A-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority(Chandigarh) . . . 481

Bad debt --Taking over liability during merger--Not bad debt--Amount not considered for calculating income in earlier years--Good debt cannot be written off--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 36(1)(vii), (2)-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

Business expenditure --Assessee engaged in acquiring land and developing it and after development land, selling plots in auction--Continuing to maintain various sectors even after completion--Staff and infrastructure jointly shared by developed and undeveloped sectors--Cash system of accounting--All cash outgoings in revenue field to be allowed--Administrative expenses allowable--Disallowance on ground partly related to incomplete projects not permissible-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 36(1)(iv), (va), 37, 40A(9), 43B-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

Capital gains --Business income--Conversion of stock-in-trade into investment--Permissible--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Sukarma Finance Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 465

----Business income--Purchases of shares and stock of shares recorded in books of account as investment--No evidence to prove trading in shares--Volume of sale consideration not determinative to prove trading in shares--Income from purchase and sale of shares to be treated under head “Capital gains†--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Sukarma Finance Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Delhi) . . . 465

Capital or revenue expenditure --Sum paid for acquisition of land for international airport at Mohali--Contribution by assessee decided by Government on basis of availability of funds--No benefit to assessee from contribution to airport--No link established to show contribution resulted directly in increase of land prices--Expenditure for acquisition of land for proposed airport not revenue expenditure--Capital expenditure not allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

Capital or revenue receipt --Assessee carrying on business of construction and development of houses and sale thereof outright or on instalment basis under hire purchase agreements--Instalments received from allottees are in nature of revenue receipts--Assessee adopting cash system of accounting during year--Not entitled to contend that in respect of instalments it was following continuously project completion method--Expenditure incurred in cash towards construction of houses and flats sold under hire purchase to be allowed--Instalments accumulated in schemes to be considered with opening stock whenever particular scheme completed--Instalments received for pending adjustments for which particulars not available--Instalments pertaining to earlier years remaining unreconciled not to be added to income in later years-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

Depreciation --Building--Assessee explaining that lands on which buildings constructed were under its ownership--Categorically stating no inclusion of any cost of land in cost of building--Depreciation to be allowed-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority(Chandigarh) . . . 481

Export --Exemption--Computation of deduction--Total turnover--Communication charges attributable to delivery of computer software outside India reduced from export turnover to be reduced also from total turnover--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10A-- Sumtotal Systems India P. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 446

Income --Accrual--Advances received for future consultancy--Chronological events of case to be considered by Assessing Officer before making addition--Matter remanded--Income-tax Act, 1961-- Corporate Law Chambers India v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 477

----Earnest money received from prospective buyers to whom no allotment made--No addition possible under cash system of accounting-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Method of accounting--Right of assessee to adopt cash system of accounting as regards “Income from other sources†--Interest on bank deposits--Right of assessee to offer it on receipt basis--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 145-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

Income-tax authorities --Assessment--Validity--Assessment made by assessing authority holding territorial jurisdiction over assessee in terms of notification issued under section 120--Valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 120, 124(5)-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Jurisdiction--Assessing Officer--Transfer of case--Orders to be passed through assessee information system--No opportunity to be provided to assessee if case is transferred within city--Objection to jurisdiction to be raised within one month from issue of notice--Provision applies to cases of revised returns--Challenge to jurisdiction not maintainable at later stage--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 120, 124, 127, 129-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

International transactions --Transfer pricing--Computation of arm’s length price--Selection of comparables--Companies having revenue from both products and software services and segment-wise data not available, companies having super normal profit, enormous turnover, companies not qualifying employee cost filter and RPT filter and functionally dissimilar cannot be treated as comparable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 92CA--Sumtotal Systems India P. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 446

Method of accounting --Assessee earlier enjoying exemption--Upon ceasure of exemption revising accounting systems--Revision having effect of increasing profits of earlier year for which assessment completed--Not permissible--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 10(20A), 145--Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

 

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Income-tax Act, 1961

S. 10(20A) --Method of accounting--Assessee earlier enjoying exemption--Upon ceasure of exemption revising accounting systems--Revision having effect of increasing profits of earlier year for which assessment completed--Not permissible-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 10A --Export--Exemption--Computation of deduction--Total turnover--Communication charges attributable to delivery of computer software outside India reduced from export turnover to be reduced also from total turnover-- Sumtotal Systems India P. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 446

S. 36(1)(iv) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 36(1)(va) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 36(1)(vii) --Bad debt--Taking over liability during merger--Not bad debt--Amount not considered for calculating income in earlier years--Good debt cannot be written off--Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 36(2) --Bad debt--Taking over liability during merger--Not bad debt--Amount not considered for calculating income in earlier years--Good debt cannot be written off-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 37 --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Capital or revenue expenditure--Sum paid for acquisition of land for international airport at Mohali--Contribution by assessee decided by Government on basis of availability of funds--No benefit to assessee from contribution to airport--No link established to show contribution resulted directly in increase of land prices--Expenditure for acquisition of land for proposed airport not revenue expenditure--Capital expenditure not allowable-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 40A(9) --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 43B --Business expenditure--Deduction only on actual payment--Provident fund contributions deposited in bank as fixed deposit after finalisation of balance-sheet--Provident fund established by assessee governed by provisions of Provident Funds Act, 1925--No question of recognition of provident fund--Employer’s contribution allowable under section 37 and employee's contribution allowable under section 36(1)(va)--Assessee falling under exceptions under section 40A(9)--Disallowance not applicable--Benefit of exception that expenditure paid before due date of filing of return allowable not available where assessee following cash system--Assessing Officer to examine whether provident fund independently monitored and whether deposits made for long periods-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 92CA --International transactions--Transfer pricing--Computation of arm’s length price--Selection of comparables--Companies having revenue from both products and software services and segment-wise data not available, companies having super normal profit, enormous turnover, companies not qualifying employee cost filter and RPT filter and functionally dissimilar cannot be treated as comparable-- Sumtotal Systems India P. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT (Hyderabad) . . . 446

S. 120 --Income-tax authorities--Assessment--Validity--Assessment made by assessing authority holding territorial jurisdiction over assessee in terms of notification issued under section 120--Valid-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Income-tax authorities--Jurisdiction--Assessing Officer--Transfer of case--Orders to be passed through assessee information system--No opportunity to be provided to assessee if case is transferred within city--Objection to jurisdiction to be raised within one month from issue of notice--Provision applies to cases of revised returns--Challenge to jurisdiction not maintainable at later stage-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority(Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 124 --Income-tax authorities--Jurisdiction--Assessing Officer--Transfer of case--Orders to be passed through assessee information system--No opportunity to be provided to assessee if case is transferred within city--Objection to jurisdiction to be raised within one month from issue of notice--Provision applies to cases of revised returns--Challenge to jurisdiction not maintainable at later stage-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 124(5) --Income-tax authorities--Assessment--Validity--Assessment made by assessing authority holding territorial jurisdiction over assessee in terms of notification issued under section 120--Valid-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 127 --Income-tax authorities--Jurisdiction--Assessing Officer--Transfer of case--Orders to be passed through assessee information system--No opportunity to be provided to assessee if case is transferred within city--Objection to jurisdiction to be raised within one month from issue of notice--Provision applies to cases of revised returns--Challenge to jurisdiction not maintainable at later stage-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 129 --Income-tax authorities--Jurisdiction--Assessing Officer--Transfer of case--Orders to be passed through assessee information system--No opportunity to be provided to assessee if case is transferred within city--Objection to jurisdiction to be raised within one month from issue of notice--Provision applies to cases of revised returns--Challenge to jurisdiction not maintainable at later stage-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 145 --Income--Method of accounting--Right of assessee to adopt cash system of accounting as regards “Income from other sources†--Interest on bank deposits--Right of assessee to offer it on receipt basis-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority(Chandigarh) . . . 481

----Method of accounting--Assessee earlier enjoying exemption--Upon ceasure of exemption revising accounting systems--Revision having effect of increasing profits of earlier year for which assessment completed--Not permissible-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

S. 246A --Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals)--Appealable orders--Assessment--Assessing Officer--Jurisdiction--No appeal lies on ground of lack of jurisdiction--Commissioner (Appeals) has no power to entertain additional ground on question of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-- Assistant CIT v. Punjab Urban Development Authority (Chandigarh) . . . 481

 

__._,_.___

Three Imp Judgements On S. 147 Writ, S. 14A/ Rule 8D Disallowance And S. 234E TDS Fine Stay

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgements are available for download at itatonline.org.


Madhukar Khosla vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

S. 147: If "reasons to believe" are not based on new, "tangible materials", the reopening amounts to an impermissible review

(ii) The foundation of the AO's jurisdiction and the raison d'etre of a reassessment notice are the "reasons to believe". Now this should have a relation or a link with an objective fact, in the form of information or facts external to the materials on the record. Such external facts or material constitute the driver, or the key which enables the authority to legitimately re-open the completed assessment. In absence of this objective "trigger", the AO does not possess jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. It is at the next stage that the question, whether the re-opening of assessment amounts to "review" or "change of opinion" arises. In other words, if there are no "reasons to believe" based on new, "tangible materials", then the reopening amounts to an impermissible review. Here, there is nothing to show what triggered the issuance of notice of reassessment – no information or new facts which led the AO to believe that full disclosure had not been made (Kelvinator of India Ltd 320 ITR 561 (SC) and Orient Craft Ltd 354 ITR 536 (Delhi) followed, Usha International 348 ITR 485 (Del) (FB) referred)


Bellwether Microfinance Fund Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

S. 14A: For Rule 8D(2)(i) only expenditure relating to investments resulting in tax-free income can be considered. For Rule 8D(2)(iii) all investments, whether yielding tax-free income or not, have to be considered

Rule 8D(2)(i) speaks of expenditure directly relating to income which does not form part of "total income". In the context of s. 2(45) & s. 5, the expression 'total income' in Rule 8D(2)(i) must relate to an income which is sought to be assessed. Therefore, only expenditure directly relating to income which is earned either on receipt basis or on accrual basis and which does not form part of total income of a particular assessment year can be disallowed under clause (i) of Rule 8D(2). However, while computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii), the average of the total investment of the assessee as appearing in the balance sheet on the first day and last day of the year irrespective of the fact whether it has yielded income or not can be considered for the purpose of disallowance.


M/s Shree Builders vs. UOI (Madhya Pradesh High Court)

S. 234E: High Court grants ad-interim stay against operation of notices levying fee for failure to file TDS statement

Issue notice to the respondents on interim relief. Additionally issue notice to Attorney General of India as the validity of the Central enactment is put in issue.

By way of ad interim relief, we direct the respondents not to take coercive action against the petitioner with regard to the subject matter referred to in the impugned Annexures P/2 to P/5. We are inclined to grant this order ex parte keeping in mind the orders passed by other High Courts (High Court of Kerala,High Court of Karnataka, High Court of Rajasthan, Bombay High Court and High Court of Orissa).


Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:  

ACIT vs. Iqbal M. Chagala (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 14A & Rule 8D cannot be applied in a mechanical manner. Disallowance cannot exceed expenditure claimed as a deduction


Eminent Jurist Escapes Dreaded Axe of S. 14A And Rule 8D Disallowance

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.


ACIT vs. Iqbal M. Chagala (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 14A & Rule 8D cannot be applied in a mechanical manner. Disallowance cannot exceed expenditure claimed as a deduction

The assessee had debited direct expenses on account of dematerialization and STT in the capital account and not in the Profit and loss account. The AO had presumed that the assessee had must have incurred some expenditure under the heads salary, telephone and other administrative charges for earning the exempt income. It is further found that the total expenditure claimed by the assessee for the year is about 13 lakhs and the AO had made a disallowance of about Rs.16 lakhs. He has just adopted the formula of estimating expenditure on the basis of investments. But, the justification for calculating the disallowance is missing. The assessee had not claimed any expenditure in its P&L account and so the onus was on the AO to prove that out of the expenditure incurred under various heads were related to earning of exempt income. Not only this he had to give the basis of such calculation. In any manner disallowance of Rs.16.35 lakhs as against the total expenditure of Rs.13 lakhs claimed by the assessee in P&L account is not justified. Rule 8D cannot and should not be applied in a mechanical way. Facts of the case have to be analyzed before invoking them. Consequently the disallowance is deleted (Justice Sam P. Bharucha 53 SOT 192 (Mum) referred)


Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest

ACIT vs. M. Baskaran (ITAT Chennai)

S. 14A/ Rule 8D: No disallowance can be made if there is no exempt income. Cheminvest (SB) &CBDT Circular are not good law