---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rebecca Andrews <rebecca.andrews88@yahoo.in>
Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs RENTING - Delhi High Court Judgement [1 Attachment]
To:
From: Rebecca Andrews <rebecca.andrews88@yahoo.in>
Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs RENTING - Delhi High Court Judgement [1 Attachment]
To:
[Attachment(s) from Rebecca Andrews included below]
Delhi High Court goes the way P&H, Orissa, Gauhati, Bombay & Gujarat High Courts. Upholds the constitutionality & retrospectivity of renting as a service effective 1.6.2007. Assessees will now have to pay tax with interest. Excerpts : 75. In view of the aforesaid analysis, we proceed to enumerate our conclusions in seriatim as follows: (a) The provisions, namely, Section 65(105)(zzzz) and Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 and as amended by the Finance Act, 2010, are intra vires the Constitution of India. (b) The decision rendered in the first Home Solution case does not lay down the correct law as we have held that there is value addition when the premises is let out for use in the course of orfurtherance of business or commerce and it is, accordingly overruled. (c) The challenge to the amendment giving it retrospective effect is unsustainable and, accordingly, the same stands repelled and the retrospective amendment is declared as constitutionally valid. 76. Consequently, the writ petitions, being sans substratum, stand dismissed without any order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, J. SANJIV KHANNA, J. 23.09.11Kind regards, Rebecca Andrews |
__._,_.___
Attachment(s) from Rebecca Andrews
1 of 1 File(s)
No comments:
Post a Comment