Why The FM’s & CBDT’s Promise Not To Reopen Retro Cases Is Still Illegal

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:49 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs Why The FM's & CBDT's Promise Not To Reopen Retro Cases Is Still Illegal
To: editor@itatonline.org

 

Dear Subscriber,

Why The FM's & CBDT's Promise Not To Reopen Retro Cases Is Still Illegal

Tarun Jain, Advocate, Supreme Court

The Q whether the promise made by the FM & the CBDT in Circular dated 29.05.2012 not to reopen completed assessments despite the retrospective amendments is legal or not has created a major controversy. The author, in the light of the criticism of his earlier view, objectively reconsiders the entire law on the subject and makes out a compelling case why his earlier view that the promises are unlawful & unenforceable is correct

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Vishnu Anant Mahajan vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad Special Bench) S. 14A disallowance applies to partner's share of profits. Depreciation is not "expenditure" & cannot be disallowed u/s 14A