Sandvik Asia Law (Interest On Interest) Is Not Correct: Supreme Court

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:27 PM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs Sandvik Asia Law (Interest On Interest) Is Not Correct: Supreme Court
To: editor@itatonline.org

 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important ordder is available for download at itatonline.org.

CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals (Supreme Court)

Sandik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) is not correct and should be reconsidered

 

The Supreme Court had to consider whether interest is payable by the Revenue to the assessee if the aggregate of instalments of Advance Tax/TDS paid exceeds the assessed tax? The assessee relied upon Sandvik Asia Limited vs. CIT 280 ITR 643 where it was held that the assessee was entitled to be compensated by the Revenue for delay in paying to it the amounts admittedly due. HELD by the Supreme Court:

 

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

CCIT Will Be Held Personally Responsible For Transfer Order Violation: CBDT