Section 271(1)(c) Penalty To Be Kept In Abeyance Till High Court Verdict On Merits: Bombay High Court

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:49 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs S. 271(1)(c) Penalty To Be Kept In Abeyance Till High Court Verdict On Merits: Bombay High Court
To: editor@itatonline.org

 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

CIT vs. Wander Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)

If Quantum Appeal admitted by Court, s. 271(1)(c) penalty proceedings may be kept in abeyance till the decision of the High Court on the merits

 

The assessee's quantum appeal against the Tribunal's order was admitted by the High Court. In the s. 271(1)(c) penalty proceedings, the Tribunal, instead of deciding the issue whether the assessee was liable to penalty, restored the issue to the AO with a direction to decide the issue of levy of penalty after the decision of the High Court in the quantum appeal. The department challenged the Tribunal's order on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to issue such an order as it would in effect extend the time limit prescribed in s. 275 for passing the penalty order (6 months from the end of the month in which the Tribunal's order is received by the CIT). HELD by the High Court dismissing the appeal:

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

Download Report Of The Expert Committee On General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR)