From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:32 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs S. 147 "Change of Opinion" Controversy Referred To Full Bench
To: editor@itatonline.org
The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.
CIT vs. Usha International Ltd (Delhi High Court)
S. 147: Q whether there is "change of opinion" if AO does not specifically apply his mind referred to Full Bench
In the Notes to accounts, the assessee had disclosed that it had received Rs.173 lakhs for transfer of exclusive distribution rights of AC and water coolers and that it was credited to capital reserve and not treated as income. The AO passed a s. 143(3) assessment order in which he did not deal with the issue. Subsequently, as the revenue audit raised an objection, the AO, within 4 years from the end of the AY, reopened the assessment on the ground that the said amount was chargeable as "Capital gains". The Tribunal, following Kelvinator 256 ITR 1 (FB) (affirmed in 320 ITR 561 (SC)), struck down the reopening on the ground that it was based on the notes on accounts that was already on record, there was no "fresh material" and so it was a case of "lapse of the AO" and a "change of opinion". On appeal by the department, HELD:
Regards,
Editor,
---------------------
Latest:
No comments:
Post a Comment