Special Bench Explains Entire Law On Scope Of Third Member Proceedings

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: editor@itatonline.org itatonline.org@gmail.com

 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

Tulip Hotels Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai Special Bench)

S. 255(4): Bench cannot refuse to give effect to Third Member's opinion

 

The Tribunal had to consider whether certain amounts could be assessed as cash credits u/s 68 and whether certain expenditure incurred by the assessee could be allowed as a deduction. The Judicial Member decided both issues in favour of the assessee while the Accountant Member decided both issues in favour of the department. The Third Member agreed with the opinion of the JM and decided both issues in favour of the assessee. At the stage of giving effect to the opinion of the Third Member, the JM passed an order in conformity with that of the Third Member. However, the AM observed that it is not possible to give effect to the order of the Third Member on the ground that the order of the Third Member was contrary to his own expressed opinion and that he had not considered various points of differences arising from the dissenting orders. He accordingly framed certain new questions on the merits of the dispute and directed that the matter be referred back to the President. The JM did not agree and raised the issue whether the Members of a Bench could comment on the order of the Third Member instead of merely passing a confirmatory order in terms of s. 255(4). This was referred to the Special Bench. HELD by the Special Bench:

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,