Despite Retro Law In Finance Act 2012, "Royalty" Not Taxable: ITAT Mumbai

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: editor@itatonline.org <itatonline.org@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:48 AM
Subject: Message from EGroup of SolapurCAs Despite Retro Law In Finance Act 2012, "Royalty" Not Taxable: ITAT Mumbai
To: editor@itatonline.org

 

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

B4U International Holdings Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Despite Retro Law By Finance Act 2012, "Royalty" Not Taxable as DTAA prevails

 

The assessee, a Mauritius company, made payment to Panamsat, USA, for hire of a "transponder satellite". The AO held that the said hire charges constituted "royalty" and that the assessee ought to have deducted TDS u/s 195 and that as it had not done so, the amount was to be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia). Before the Tribunal, the department argued that though as per Asia Satellite 332 ITR 340 (Del), the hire charges were not assessable as "royalty", this verdict was no longer good law in view of the amendment to s. 9(1)(vi) by the Finance Act 2012 w.r.e.f. 1.4.1976 to provide that such hire charges shall be assessable as "royalty". HELD by the Tribunal:

(Click Here To Read More)

Regards,

Editor,

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

DDIT vs. B4U International Holdings Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) Tax implications of a "Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment" explained

_